Search results

I totally agree with this.

Trying really hard not to bite you TEASE you! :lolol::lolol:

It may not change things. Or it may change things. Who knows, the point is that the Government has seen the strength of feeling. Just look at the poll tax riots. A big factor in bringing Thatcher down. Mob behaviour, does on occasion, help promote positive policy outcomes. In fact there are...

:thumbsup: :facepalm: Hampshire, argue like an adult or don't bother mate, there's a good lad. I am familiar with Smith v ADVFN, according to 5rb.com "postings on bulletin board discussion groups are much more akin to slander than to libel. There is sense in the point, but the essential...

:lolol::lolol: Would you? Thanks. Then I can stop pointing out what a terrible choice of profession you have for a name calling, malicious old git. Joey Deacon's Disco Suit - slander is when it is spoken, libel is when it is written down or recorded. Like on here for example. I have quite a...

Good point, you're doing yourself the world of good... by being descriminatory and libellous. :lolol::thumbsup:

They never do. Just give it a few years an we'll be proved right. Unfortunately. I think that's the only way. Any one worth having a reasonable debate has stopped bothering now this thread has turned into a BINTFEST thanks to Hampshire Seagull and co.

A well argued point and no one can condon the violence. At all. It was unacceptable. I just hope as with the poll tax riots, mob behaviour occasionally does help promote positive policy outcomes.

For a lecturer, your responses on here have been quite frankly pathetic and you are letting your profession down. What is it you teach? Aggression and Abuse 101? In fact don't answer that, I'd only get a tirade of abuse. I thought lecturers like yourself might be more game for intelligent debate...

When was that ever suggested by anyone on the planet, ever? Although I might point out that many of the most revered comedians are very highly educated indeed. I stopped reading here I'm afraid.

Not sure anyone would disagree, it's a question of how your should pay and how much. That is what we are disgussing here, not that it should be totally state funded, but by all means miss the point...

I suggest you go and have a look at this, and watch all of it, and do so with an open mind. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDEZ2h41t0I Having a degree isn't soley about making money... These generalisations of students I find really quite sad. Straight out of the comments section of the Daily...

That's an excellent video from a very smart man indeed.

OK so maybe we should abolish higher education altogether then? After all students have no common sense, drink too much and have not in any way contributed to the economy what-so-ever. Of course there isn't an argument that those with a good education help keep this country at the forefront of...

No absolutely not. But when the Government shits on people tempers run high. Go and read the thread from the begining, this has already been done.

*gives up* Hi Barnham. Welcome to completely missing the point. Population: You.

I never suggested it was. I was simply saying you learn more at Uni than just a course. Read the post I was replying to, it might put it in context.

It's hardly mutually exclusive. You never know, after going off to study for that degree, they may even come back knowing how to live on their own, change light bulbs, and even cook and clean for themselves. Many people consider going away to a university as one of the best ways to learn common...

....Which suggests to me a sliding scale is the way forward, the more likely the job leads to a job in that field, the lower the fee. Why should the poorest not be given a chance of self betterment for purely financial reasons? Surely a society like ours looks to protect the vulnerable.

No. They're more single minded about who should pay and how. How does that make them right?