ah, i see, 'from what you've heard', he must be guilty as charged then, absolutely watertight case, i might have to remind you of that in the future, funny how the guardian can be the absolute standard bearer of truth on some occasions , but it's stories are ignored when it suits .
'Sounds' being the operative word here , your view is pure conjecture,because you want it to be true,and it happens to be wrong , here's a link to the the truth.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/dec/20/chelsea-defend-john-terry