Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. H

    Back to back bollocks

    That list started in the 50s and ended in 1990 - a near 40 year period, over which you'd expect some teams to have a period of dominance, that's the cyclical nature of the game. We're now talking about a 10 year period (or longer) in which six, maybe eight, clubs will completely dominate. And...
  2. H

    Back to back bollocks

    Nope. If, for example, four or five of the big boys get knocked out by each other early doors (or if one of them has a bad couple of games and loses to a smaller club), there's an opportunity for, say, the champions of Denmark or France to make a run to the quarters or later, pumping money into...
  3. H

    Back to back bollocks

    The main difference, NF9, would be that the spread of money would filter into the other countries, not just the big boys. Currently the big clubs from the big leagues are snaffling the lions' share of the cash because they pick up most points in the league stage, and dominate the knock out...

Top
Link Here