Search results

So £138,000 a year pays for the majority of... Four full-time coaches' salaries A contribution to Martin Hinshelwood's salary Scouting salaries and expenses Insurance Rent of pitches and grounds Transport to and from matches/training Kit & supplies Food Education Legal expenses Bugger knows...

Oh great, two prats stalking me. I will say this - at least you have a modicum of intelligence when talking about the Albion. Big Gully just makes stuff up. Other than that, f*** off you racist turd.

Ah, so that's all it takes to run the Academy and Youth set-up. Jesus wept.

Good f***ing grief. :thud:

If there's one thing Andy Naylor will not do, it's blindly toe the club line.

The club HAS spent a lot of money on Lynch (and every other player who came through the system, and even those who didn't quite make it) - you're just going to have to accept that (though I suspect you can't). Money does come in from other sources, but not even remotely enough to cover the...

Jesus, you just get worse. Opinions based on 'evidence that can't be validated' is merely speculation, and therefore has no value apart from - in this instance - your own self-arrogated 'if it sounds plausible, and I thought of it, therefore might be true'. Incidentally, the stuff about Lynch...

Don't bother - we've all been there with this one. He's admitted himself he doesn't know, and bases his reasoning on his own 'true belief'. i.e. that's what he thinks, therefore it's true. Facts and truth can go f*** themselves as far as he's concerned.

It's hard, bordering on pointless to have a debate with someone who is going to re-write history and claim it as fact. So I won't bother. I'm out.

They would be bidding on a player who is contracted to us for another two seasons, was in the manager's plans and whom the club spent an awful lot of money, time and effort to get him to the stage he is at. The management at the Albion, at the time of Forest taking him on loan, wanted Lynch at...

You've made quite an assumptive leap there. Micky Adams TWICE turned down Lynch's transfer request, the first time round publicly stating that Joel featured in his plans. Just because there may or may not have been disagreements or arguments pre-season or whenever, it does not automatically...

But that's still, to a point, depends on what the nature of the problems were.

Can we have that phrase in plain English please?

Sorry, what? :shrug:

Not necessarily. If it has nothing to do with him not being picked, the Colin Hawkins stuff about 'I'm not surprised he's gone if that donkey can get in the team ahead of him' stuff kind of ebbs away, and leads to more deep-rooted issues. It depends on what the off-field problems were.

Someone did tell me (can't remember who) that Hawesy was working for Radio Sheffield as a stand-in commentator recently. Could be wrong, mind.