Search results

I didn't mean to suggest the quality of football was on a par with arsenal. I was merely highlighting that the idea of putting grinding out wins ahead of beautiful football wasn't a new idea, and wasn't something that won't lead to success, that it had worked for others. I saw about 10 games...

So that's the only way it could work? You don't allow for the possibility that in conversation with the editor dick knight expressed how upset he was with some negative articles, that he intimated or flat out said the club wouldn't co-operate with the argus, wouldn't let them in at certain...

Didn't you hear Naylor?: "IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ADAMS!!!!! Stop moaning about adams he's the best! he is a god, these are just nasty rumours being spread by dean wilkins who is feeling bad about being such a miserable failure." Or, y'know, words to that effect.

Naylor is writing an article absolving Micky Adams from any responsibility for the negativity at the club? No way! I imagine if he could he'd put the blame on Wilkins...* *NB - Not meant as a comment on our managers, more as a comment on Naylors attitude to them, his not seeing any negativity...