Why do we need Newcastle to get a point - they're above Chelsea on GD? Surely if both lose, Newcastle would need to get absolutely pumped by Everton at St James to finish below?
You better believe it! I wouldn’t be. Balanced against the loss of being able to fully celebrate a goal when the ref and lino indicate all is well which is what football is (was) for me, it’s not even close.
This wouldn’t do anything to reduce the controversy surrounding VAR’s use. I get the principle, but in reality it’d make things even worse.
First, ‘obvious’ is subjective. Second, incorrect decisions that were not ‘obvious’ during the review would generate outcry. And third, it’s likely the...
No (though it was deserved), but I'm increasingly surprised by the standing ovation our players seem to get from half the crowd when being subbed, no matter the standard of their performance.
We’re an incredibly soft team with no visible backbone when things get tough at times. The way they crumbled today under the pressure from the stands was quite telling.
The insurance doesn’t cover scenarios where you’re just not able to attend (e.g. due to work, childcare, whatever it may be) btw, except for in a very specific set of provable circumstances. Ticket purchase insurance is one step away from a scam.
Yes, I do.
The USAID issue represents an unconstitutional move, yes, hence the instant legal reaction.
Implementing policy that is unconstitutional is entirely different to amending the constitution itself which, unless an issue of significant bipartisan importance comes to pass over the next...
You'd need a large number of Democrat senators and representatives to vote in favour in order for an amendment to happen (2/3s of both houses). And all of the GOP. The constitution was designed specifically to prevent this sort of thing from happening. Which it wont.
Oops, sorry, was meant to...