Search results

I don't think anyone with 17,021 posts can accuse anyone of having better things to do.

I have a look at NSC from time to time, maybe once every few weeks at best. It offers an alternative view to that other great Brighton and Hove institution, the Argus website. NSC seems to have deteriorated in terms of quality over the last few years and there are more interesting sites out...

Classy. Mods - please can you delete my account - I can't seem to be able to do it myself - I only came back to see if I could delete the account and found that people are still talking about me years later. Don't you guys have anything better to discuss?

Good morning. I agree. That's precisely the reason I no longer go on there.

I'm here old boy, never fear, and doing well, despite the recession. The same can't be said for the Albion - languishing at the foot of League 1 (or the 3rd Division in old money), less than a 6,000 crowd for a vital relegation game yesterday, and still in debt to the tune of £13m or so. BTW...

I'm here. If you fill the ground against Leeds it will not be because people want to see the Albion, but because they want to see Leeds. We all know the core support for the Albion is about 5,000 in third tier football. It will be less if you are relegated. Kisses on my flying visit.

P,S. If you want to feel better about yourself, I can just give in if you want.

I assume you are kidding because this whole thing must be a major embarrassment for you.

Where have I ever said legal fees? Post a link please. If I'm wrong, I'm always happy to admit it and apologise.

What I received: "Subject to a final legal agreement, the Council has agreed to provide the land for the stadium development but will not otherwise be responsible for the financing or implementation of the project. The Council agreed to allocate the land for the stadium and supported the...

I've known the costs for over a year, as I have had them in writing from the council. When the stadium is built, it will be interesting to see the unemployment figures in East Brighton. Numbers never lie. As long as they are represented honestly.... BTW, some of the most deprived areas in...

Read the first, flawed decision letter.

Hooray! Although it's now too late, someone's actually asking the right questions. Well done. The stadium was given permission ONLY because of the supposed socio-economic benefits.... and for no other reason. Prescott stated that the city doesn't deserve a stadium of right, that it would be...

I have said that I accept the decision, even though I don't agree with it - what more do you want? But if you really want to share your brain like a planet, perhaps you can answer the following: What is the difference between development and re-generation? What is being re-generated in East...

The quotes over the last few days are nothing to do with me. Unfortunately, the Argus website doesn't do security. As for the 5 minutes, that's all it took me to ask for the information, and 30 seconds to read the written reply. You guys are clearly doing something wrong. As for my view on...

What I'm not going to do now, as I have in the past in the Argus threads, is go through the documentation and then extract snippets to support my argument - I just can't be bothered enough, which is why I am unmoved by the arguments I have read here. Been there, done that, and I remain unbowed...

Nothing I have read here makes me feel any different about the stadium. Keep going. It is amazing how differently you guys see the stadium issue from the Falmer residents and LDC and their voters.

Nothing I have read here makes me feel any different about the stadium. Keep going. It is amazing how differently you guys see the stadium issue from the Falmer residents and LDC and their voters.

Just say the numbers. You clearly believe you have the answer. So why not just say it straight out? I think I asked before? Not sure what point you're making unless you're unsure of your "facts".........

Even if I am wrong about the second enquiry..... Prescott's decision has been quashed, i.e. it is as if had never existed. The evidence will therefore have to be judged against the existing reports. The first stated that planning permission be refused ABSOLUTELY because the evidence against...