Search results

What’s the charge, being an arse? Probably guilty. Not moving with the times? Probably guilty. Sexual assault? Innocent till proven guilty. Whereas you are guilty of trying to be a condescending prat.

Surely a fair trial for ALL would be the most important?

Brother. Guilty by association in your eyes?

Very droll. What I meant was ’not recent’, but you knew that anyway.

Maybe Pete will have changed his mind in twelve years time? It won’t be so funny then.

I think you may have misread my point. Most of the claims about Wallace are historical, maybe Lorraine Kelly will be complained about in years to come.

Not yet, but give it ten years.

No, but that is the point. How do you know how someone will react?

Equality……

String ‘em up for rumours you say?

As opposed to a currently tubby, bleached spiky haired, plastic jock singing Do you think I’m sexy? in spandex leopard print pants? Oh, it was a different time you say? That must make it OK then.

Rumours? Care to elaborate? If he is rumoured to have told sexualised jokes then so fxxkin what? Until there is meat on the bones of any accusations then this kind of stuff should be treated with contempt. That is not a licence to ignore real sensible concerns about people doing wrong, but an...