I was trying to explain the length of time, which doesn't mean excusing it. We know that VAR is faulty when they draw the wrong lines, from experience.
As it happens this time, it confirmed what the ref and lino had decided. Martin knows this and was making excuses.
I was at home, so watched the replays. The first part of the VAR check was to see if JPVH made contact when he swung his leg at the cross. That would’ve cancelled out any offside.
Football focus showed the highlights with Pat Nevin & the other pundit both saying Armstrong was interfering with play. BV did alter his shape very slightly. Correct decision in their view.
Firstly they checked to see if JPVH made contact when he swung his leg out, as that would make any offside ruling superfluous. He didn’t. Then they checked to see if the scorer was offside, but he was onside by a smidgeon.
Finally, they looked to see if Armstrong, who was offside, and if he...