Search results

Yes - he says that it should only be for 'clear and obvious' errors and subjective things should be left to the on-field ref. Then goes on to say that VAR should have overturned the on-field ref's subjective decision!

The 'original' decision was not to allow it - lino flagged it as offside, even if he did take his time. The VAR delay wasn't about the Armstrong involvement. It took them about 4 minutes to work out that the scorer was onside with lines and so on. Then about 10 more seconds to rule that...

You wouldn't have seen much - didn't see much on the screen either, just waffling from the commentators - then a line, and 'onside' flashed up. At least we had a commentator to explain that they were then looking at the other guy. If they just had a silent scree at the ground showing 'onside'...

Not sure about the highlighted bit. Different streams gave different reasons. One said it was because of the flick, another said he was simply interfering by distracting the keeper. Either way - he was miles offside and clearly interfering with play (in my opinion).