Search results

The BBC have reacted by sending out guidance to their staff. But I learned about it on ITV....... I can't find anything about it on the BBC website. I don't know if Gregg Wallace is employed by the BBC or not, or whether there may be HR/contractual considerations involved...

What does Captain Cook think about this?

Moving on, is there a debate going on in Australia with 'woke', 'progressives' and 'worldviews'? A debate about the epidemic of sexual harassment in Australia, that I showed you in the link I posted in post #754? Is this the background to your evangelical zeal on this Gregg Wallace thread?

You don't remember what you've written do you? Here is the relevant post. There is no prefix of 'if guilty' or similar. How have I taken 'and I don't have any issue with him being reprimanded in this case', out of context? What was the context, if you didn't mean 'I don't have any issue...

No, this thread is about Wallace and his victims. As you are determined to widen the discussion, a good place to start might be a lot closer to home. Australia is a generation behind the times. A good 30 years...

You asked where do you draw the line. In my post you teplied to, I said 17. Tha current number of complaints. Where would you draw the line then? Clearly 17 isn't enough for you to countenance the likelihood of guilt. In an earlier post you said Wallace should be reprimanded. For what? Being...

No. I'm saying that people should be thinking about the victims first and foremost. Those who have come forward and potentially those who have yet to do so, and are agonising over it. Discussions over a fair trial, should there be one, should come further down the list.

The women who have so far come forward, are the ones who rejected his advances, and who have had the courage to speak out, sometimes after many years. Do you see the implications?

17 (alleged) victims. Maybe there are more we don't know about. But let's draw a line under it at 17. Is he: a) Probably not guilty b) Probably guilty You can do this Woody.

But you are defending him. You are campaigning for him to have a fair trial. I would have thought it more important that his 17 (and counting) alleged victims get a fair trial.

The point is, that you accuse multiple people of taking what you write, out of context. Do you think this is a problem with your audience, or a problem with what you write?

Don't forget you accused me of taking something you wrote out of context as well !

That potato has more class, likeability, judgement, and future than Gregg Wallace...

The investigation is widening. Every day, more claims are made. Now GW is making his own claims.....

I think we're now up to 17 aren't we? 13 to begin with, 3 more after GW accused middle-age women of a certain age ganging up on him, and now his ghost writer.

I knew it. He was a bloody northerner.

Yes, that narrative rings very true. I googled 'why are Australians obsessed with Captain Cook', after someone included him in a complaint about 'progressives' being intolerant of Gregg Wallace's misdemeanours. After googling it, it actually does seem that Australians really are obsessed with...

Captain Cook, Lorraine Kelly, Ned Kelly. What is it about Australian based members of this forum, that leads them to be unable or unwilling to get it about Gregg Wallace? Did you know that some Australians think Captain Cook was born in Australia? The continent he discovered in his adulthood?

**** wakes up **** Ask the Kremlin. They'll have a way.

Yeah, that's as good as my critical thinking gets. I can't compete with all you critical thinkers down there in Ballarat. You asked where I suggest that you are being pushed. It was where you used the word 'push'. Here it is again: 'What is happening is in the push to change the old...