Search results

Indeed, and I didn't mean to create the impression that these were the only two options.

You raise numerous sound points in here. I think you're being a little harsh on the 'playing with intensity', so I'll try and make the case for this, and make a few further points. Yes, playing with intensity entails working harder, but it's more than that. It means that we pressurise the...

I refer you to the post from @Guinness Boy for a wider perspective, although I'm not entirely convinced losing 4-2 to Chelsea is a bad result (there were concerns about the game plan). The plan is to press high, play with intensity (probably the most used FH word) and squeeze the opposition...

While the pair of you are too polite to say as much, you and @pigmanovich seem to be saying that @Justice is astoundingly wrong in his analysis.

There I was thinking we lost it two-nil, which was probably the other home Leicester game under CH

Maddison has done that before at The Amex, earning a second yellow after about half an hour. We still lost though.

This to me at least is so obvious and has been for a while. I can only think that those that don't are relying on an earlier version of both players.

Agree with you that he's been clearly our best CB this season, which takes some saying. Not going to get PotS though, although comfortably in second place for me. That list has some quality players, as does the Dutch (potential) squad, and JPvH warrants his place in that company.

There is. To 'Hey Mickey'

That's the player ratings thread done

Gilmour clearly MotM for me. Not sure anyone else deserve anything more than a 6. Pervis was good in the first half, but faded quickly in the second.

Depends what he wants. I'd be surprised if we play less than 50 games next season -- given that the public statement is that we're going for four competitions -- and that will probably mean that a player with the profile of Van Hecke would get game time in the rough region of 20 of them. Also...