The detail the donor is in the Caymans is only part of the story.
This donation is one of the biggest the Labour party has ever received and from a hedge fund with significant shares in private health, arms and fossil fuels companies. It appears it was deliberately timed to avoid surfacing...
Regarding 1) I did some more digging and GB news have highlighted it via a video. Cant yet see it on any other sites.
Another possibility is that Media companies don't want to expose something that could lead to an investigation into their own billionaire owner(s) offshore tax affairs and...
Here you go
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/labour-given-4m-from-tax-haven-based-hedge-fund-with-shares-in-oil-and-arms/
Why should anyone have to check a niche publication like Private Eye for such a story. It should be covered across all ''major publications''
I know I posted this before but still seeking an answer. Can anyone explain why it appears (Happy to be corrected) that no main stream newspaper is picking this up
https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2024/09/19/4-million-from-cayman-that-will-do-nicely-thank-you/
Does moving on from the 1900s (whatever that supposed to mean) entail having MPS that serve corporate interests as opposed to the electorate it serves? Sounds like great progress!
Corruption in plain view but people prefer to put their fingers in their ears and pretend it's ok.
I will say that I believe Tories do a special line corruption. In general they seem to be more concerned and successful than others with lining their and their friends pockets. Covid was a perfect case study of how MPs use disaster to profit.
Labour corruption for the main comes can be seen in...
I doubt we have anywhere near the same political opinions (think you said you are Tory?) but the use of ignore by some on this forum is a bit childish
Understandable if someone is being defamatory or persistently insulting but not when it's used because someone has a different view.
There is unfortunately anti-semitism and racism across all of society and across all parties. There are no studies to show it's more prevalent in Labour than other parties. AS was chosen as the weapon of choice against Corbyn because of his anti-apartheid Israel stance but also his tax and...
Says the "man" that puts laughing emojis constantly over topics discussing the massacre of thousands of men, women and children.
https://www.jewishvoiceforlabour.org.uk/article/fifty-times-jeremy-corbyn-stood-with-jewish-people/
His "rampant anti-Semitism" is a figment of your imagination but carry on the delusion if it helps. It was weaponised against him much like it is being done today against critics of Israeli Apartheid and genocide.
His support and lobbying for Apartheid Israel and their current genocide is out in the open and tweets will be saved in the "Way back" machine..
Thie fact that this sort of candidate being welcomed into the Labour Party tells you what sort of cesspit it is becoming.
Correction "zero tolerance on anything anti-Israel". The weaponisation of a serious issue (AS) continues
For anyone questioning this, ask yourself - If Faiza Shaheen was on the right of the party would she still be running as candidate today? I think we all know the answer is yes.