I'm a supporter of what we're trying to do. But there's a lot in between just playing "high line, high press" or a low block counter attack type game. It's not one or the other
Whatever tactics we played at Stamford Bridge, the most likely outcome was defeat. They will likely finish top 4.
The positive are, we're scoring goals, our new players are integrating, and whether you like the plan or not, we look like a team with a plan
I agree, it's asking a huge amount of an inexperienced player. It's also a concern I had about Hinsh, but he stepped in remarkably well.
I sort of think we shouldn't chop and change our back 4 more than injury dictates we have to. If we're playing the Dixon Adams, Bould, Winterburn step...
Agreed.
Let's not go overboard. He's an incredibly talented young player. His rate of improvement is incredible. But he's still got lots of work to do on his game.
There's every reason to think he will be a Champions League level player at one of the biggest clubs in Europe in a few years...
Agree with you. Haaland missed a free header from 6 yards out in that game. This Man City thing is a thing which people have kept saying to each other till it came true.
In my mind, the truth is that there has been steady improvement all the time he's been playing. He's had great games, good...
I get the model, we get decent young players, bring them through, sell them on.
But this has only worked because we've got a core of servants. People who know the culture of the club, steady hands to help bring the youngsters through.
This is what I hope Van Hecke becomes. The next step for...
From our point of view, I can see that what you are saying makes sense.
Though I reckon the player is likely to reason the proposition we're offering him is 5th choice centre back, behind, (or at least not ahead of), Webby, Veltman and any player we sign to replace Colwill, (or Levi himself)...