Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Russia invades Ukraine (24/02/2022)



Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,389
Goldstone
I really don’t “need to be able to guess”.

You're trying to make the argument that we should send troops to Ukraine now. Our government can't do that without working out what the consequences would be, and I don't think you're in a position to say they're making the wrong decision when you haven't even tried to work out what the consequences would be.


But the fight is going to happen.

I’d rather it be sooner than later.

You're stating that as fact and you're wrong, it's not a fact. Other possibilities include:
1) Arming Ukraine whilst restricting Russian trade to the extent that Russia can no longer afford to prosecute the war, and they withdraw.
2) A united Europe arming themselves to the extent that Russia knows they'd badly lose a war, and provide security guarantees to areas under threat from Russia (eg, a pact with the Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, and the unoccupied area of Ukraine).

These examples could lead to an end to the current conflict, without any European boots on the ground. You stating that we are definitely going to have a military war with Russia so we might as well start now is mad.
 
Last edited:




The Clamp

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2016
27,129
West is BEST
I agree he's a witless ****, but there is an element of truth to this. I remember taking to a nice Ukrainian tiler well over a decade ago, and while we were just chatting shit he was very determined to make clear that he was Russian Ukrainian, not Ukrainian Ukrainian despite me offering no encouragement or even an opening to such information.
Would these perhaps be the thousands of Russians that moved into areas of Ukraine invaded by Russia in 2014?

Incentivised by rock bottom prices on property and businesses stolen from the people of Ukraine who were either murdered or deported out of that area of Ukraine?
You're trying to make the argument that we should send troops to Ukraine now. Our government can't do that without working out what the consequences would be, and I don't think you're in a position to say they're making the wrong decision when you haven't even tried to work out what the consequences would be.




You're stating that as fact and you're wrong, it's not a fact. Other possibilities include:
1) Arming Ukraine whilst restricting Russian trade to the extent that Russia can no longer afford to prosecute the war, and they withdraw.
2) A united Europe arming themselves to the extent that Russia knows they'd badly lose a war, and prove security guarantees to areas under threat from Russia (eg, a pact with the Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, and the unoccupied area of Ukraine).

These examples could lead to an end to the current conflict, without any European boots on the ground. You stating that we are definitely going to have a military war with Russia so we might as well start now is mad.
Okay.
 
Last edited:


Deportivo Seagull

I should coco
Jul 22, 2003
5,942
Mid Sussex
If it all goes horribly wrong, the EU can blame the UK!
If it all goes horribly wrong that will be the least of our worries.
I do know from working in a European joint venture that the brits invariably acted as peace maker and so I’m not so surprised.
 
Last edited:


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,389
Goldstone
I agree he's a witless ****, but there is an element of truth to this. I remember taking to a nice Ukrainian tiler well over a decade ago, and while we were just chatting shit he was very determined to make clear that he was Russian Ukrainian, not Ukrainian Ukrainian despite me offering no encouragement or even an opening to such information.

But that makes no difference at all to what's being discussed. If you go to Canada and meet some people who are French Canadian, that doesn't suddenly mean France has the right to annex a chunk of Canada.

There were Russians inside of Ukraine. They are free to f*** off back to Russia.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
Jan 11, 2016
27,129
West is BEST
But that makes no difference at all to what's being discussed. If you go to Canada and meet some people who are French Canadian, that doesn't suddenly mean France has the right to annex a chunk of Canada.

There were Russians inside of Ukraine. They are free to f*** off back to Russia.
Apologies didn’t mean to just type “okay”

Your points on my previous post are obviously valid.

I sometimes just want to see Russia smashed into the ground.

But as you say, it’s not as simple at that.
 




Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,389
Goldstone
Apologies didn’t mean to just type “okay”

Your points on my previous post are obviously valid.

I sometimes just want to see Russia smashed into the ground.

But as you say, it’s not as simple at that.

We all (well, 99% of us) want to see Russian aggression destroyed. What upsets me about the West the most is that they didn't do enough (anything?) after 2014. We're hear because of Western weakness. Obviously and because Putin is an evil dictator, but that part was out of our control. If the West had done their job, he would have been stopped.

We are already at war with Russia, just not not on the front line yet, and I too just want us to get stuck in and deal with the problem head on. But I know it's not as simple as that. And Trump is currently making it even harder.
 


SouthSaxon

Stand or fall
NSC Patron
Jan 25, 2025
887
For any of the 1% lurking here, to remove any remaining doubt of Russian intentions: here they are on state TV musing about an alliance with Germany in which they divide up all of Europe between them.

Unhinged, yes, but that hasn’t stopped people trying in the past.

 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,389
Goldstone
For any of the 1% lurking here, to remove any remaining doubt of Russian intentions: here they are on state TV musing about an alliance with Germany in which they divide up all of Europe between them.

Unhinged, yes, but that hasn’t stopped people trying in the past.



WTF is that?
 
















A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
22,525
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Another day, and Trump drops another bollock.


Probably time to start selling your shares in Boeing and Lockheed Martin if you’ve got them, they’re going to be thrilled about this
 




jackanada

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2011
3,674
Brighton
But that makes no difference at all to what's being discussed. If you go to Canada and meet some people who are French Canadian, that doesn't suddenly mean France has the right to annex a chunk of Canada.

There were Russians inside of Ukraine. They are free to f*** off back to Russia.

That's not what I meant. I'm talking about families who have lived in the region way before the soviet union who consider themselves ethnically Russian.
It doesn't justify anything Russia has done but that single part has truth to it
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
55,389
Goldstone
That's not what I meant. I'm talking about families who have lived in the region way before the soviet union who consider themselves ethnically Russian.
It doesn't justify anything Russia has done but that single part has truth to it

Which part has a truth to it? Yes it's true that there are some people who lived in Ukraine who considered themselves Russian-Ukrainian. Just like there are people who consider themselves French-Canadian. But Steve Witless said:

"They’re Russian-speaking, there have been referendums where the overwhelming majority of the people have indicated they want to be under Russian rule. I think that’s the key issue in the conflict.”

and you replied that 'there is an element of truth to this'.

NO THERE ISN'T!

The people did not vote to indicate they wanted to be under Russian rule, that's complete bullshit. And the fact that there were some people who considered themselves Russian-Ukrainian doesn't change that.
 


papachris

Well-known member
That's not what I meant. I'm talking about families who have lived in the region way before the soviet union who consider themselves ethnically Russian.
It doesn't justify anything Russia has done but that single part has truth to it
If they are so desperate to be Russian, they could move there. What Russia has done for many years is take over other countries then encourage Russians to move there. I live in Estonia. Plenty of Russians moved here during soviet times. It doesn't make it Russia. And Estonian's are fiercely independent
 


Nobby

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2007
3,012
America is English speaking, does that mean it should belong to England then?
I agree he's a witless ****, but there is an element of truth to this. I remember taking to a nice Ukrainian tiler well over a decade ago, and while we were just chatting shit he was very determined to make clear that he was Russian Ukrainian, not Ukrainian Ukrainian despite me offering no encouragement or even an opening to such information.
So you’re saying that one conversation means everyone in the Donbass wants to be run by Russia?
Ever heard of democracy
 




Nobby

Well-known member
Sep 29, 2007
3,012
That's not what I meant. I'm talking about families who have lived in the region way before the soviet union who consider themselves ethnically Russian.
It doesn't justify anything Russia has done but that single part has truth to it
I would tell you the story of a friend of mine who moved his family from the Donbass because he could see what was coming
He hates the Ruscists with a passion
But it would be a waste of my time
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here