Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Was it a penalty?

Was it a penalty?


  • Total voters
    403
  • Poll closed .


jessiejames

Never late in a V8
Jan 20, 2009
2,705
Brighton, United Kingdom
The FA laws of the game are freely available on the internet. You need to look for penalty and direct free kick….all will then become clear. I also posted the relevant laws in an earlier post.
Still not clear though. Are we saying its down to the ref to decide if there was any malice in the tackle?

In all honesty if that had happened against Arsenal, no way is a penalty given
 




Cotton Socks

Skint Supporter
Feb 20, 2017
1,735
Yes it was a penalty. On a positive note it proves my point to Jnr that his 'it's not a foul if you've touched the ball' theory is wrong. I'll cherry pick the quotes on this thread to read to him in the morning. (y)
 


METALMICKY

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2004
6,090
So what we can conclude is that nobody is quite sure of the relevance of getting a touch on the ball in the decision making process for adjudging a foul. And if there is a relevance is it consistently applied?
 


Cotton Socks

Skint Supporter
Feb 20, 2017
1,735
So what we can conclude is that nobody is quite sure of the relevance of getting a touch on the ball in the decision making process for adjudging a foul. And if there is a relevance is it consistently applied?
Yep, I think that sums it up! ;)
 


Curious Orange

Punxsatawney Phil
Jul 5, 2003
9,964
On NSC for over two decades...
I'm really ambivalent about this one. I can see why it was given, but I also can't shake the feeling that if the same thing happened at the other end that the ref would have been instructed to visit the monitor...
 








Of course it's a penalty. Ffs.
🤣 I sometimes think I’m in the twilight zone on here, how can a faint touch on a ball give you the right to chop away an attackers’ legs in the penalty area, undignified stuff
 




Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
21,045
The arse end of Hangleton
It wasn’t a goal scoring opportunity, he didn’t do it on purpose, not a penalty.

We
It wasn’t a goal scoring opportunity, he didn’t do it on purpose, not a penalty.

We would have still lost.
What on earth does "he didn't mean to do it have to do with it" ? Stone cold pen.
 


 


jackalbion

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2011
4,052
🤣 I sometimes think I’m in the twilight zone on here, how can a faint touch on a ball give you the right to chop away an attackers’ legs in the penalty area, undignified stuff
Because you make the tackle to win the ball, Lamptey won the ball, he touched it first. If you can win the ball and it’s still a penalty, then you might as well give up on tackling, it’s a terrible decision, but the useless POGMOL will promote this waste of space.
 




jcdenton08

Enemy of the People
NSC Patron
Oct 17, 2008
10,722
Because you make the tackle to win the ball, Lamptey won the ball, he touched it first. If you can win the ball and it’s still a penalty, then you might as well give up on tackling, it’s a terrible decision, but the useless POGMOL will promote this waste of space.
So if you win the ball but absolutely smash the attacker that’s fair game? Sorry no, I disagree.
 












Rodney Thomas

Well-known member
May 2, 2012
1,575
Ελλάδα
It’s a penalty. Silly clumsy tackle from the wrong side with a dangled leg. Gets a touch on the ball initially, but stops Jesus getting the second ball.

Pedro has won almost identical penalties for us this season.

However, the rest of the officiating in the first half was suspect as hell. Offsides missed, simple free kicks to us missed. Very, very poor.
When has Pedro won a similar on this season?
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here