the vast majority of his supporters wouldn't have watched the original speech. they'll first see the headline reactions, then the counter-claims of a "hoax". whether manner said was deliberate or not, the media played along, either a predictable part or creating an issue.
Problem is, though, that:
Seems like a reputable information source, run by a nice fellowTalking points…
WATCH: The 3 Trillion-ish Times the Media Has Used 'Bloodbath' in Reporting.
The bloodbath hoax continues to limp along, with fresh evidence emerging of the media's selective outrage when it comes to President Donald Trump, whothenationalpulse.com
I wasn’t aware of these but it is not surprising- Trump has numerous civil lawsuits filed against him - he did before he even became President.
However - These are minor civil cases brought by the civil rights organisation, NAACP to which Democratic lawmakers (in their capacity as House Committee members) joined in suit. It was about Trump‘s role in the attack on the Capitol on Jan 6 preventing members of Congress from tallying up the votes and subjecting them to a violent attack - hardly ‘victimising Trump’ - more the other way round.
As you say, the other documents case went no where and was part of the oversight of a sitting President who was using his personal property (The Trump International Hotel in Washington) to make money from people renting rooms because it gave them access and possible influence over the Whitehouse - again entirely appropriate line of investigation where there was an obvious conflict of interest and Trump using the Presidency for private enrichment.
Trump can’t break the law with impunity and then claim he is being victimised and witch-hunted when attempts are made to bring him to justice- that is absurd but I’m afraid it has been his modus operandi for decades.
I just can’t believe that in 10 months we could be going through all this again.
This.I wasn’t aware of these but it is not surprising- Trump has numerous civil lawsuits filed against him - he did before he even became President.
However - These are minor civil cases brought by the civil rights organisation, NAACP to which Democratic lawmakers (in their capacity as House Committee members) joined in suit. It was about Trump‘s role in the attack on the Capitol on Jan 6 preventing members of Congress from tallying up the votes and subjecting them to a violent attack - hardly ‘victimising Trump’ - more the other way round.
As you say, the other documents case went no where and was part of the oversight of a sitting President who was using his personal property (The Trump International Hotel in Washington) to make money from people renting rooms because it gave them access and possible influence over the Whitehouse - again entirely appropriate line of investigation where there was an obvious conflict of interest and Trump using the Presidency for private enrichment.
Trump can’t break the law with impunity and then claim he is being victimised and witch-hunted when attempts are made to bring him to justice
I just can’t believe that in 10 months we could be going through all this again.
Awful to say it but really the best solution to the Trump problem is his death, as soon as possible. There's not many people I would say that about (Putin, obviously). What a state of affairs.
Typical, attack the source but not the content.Seems like a reputable information source, run by a nice fellow
Raheem Kassam - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
What a state of affairs indeed! TDS on full display.
Typical, attack the source but not the content.
There's little point is trying to digest most US media on Trump or Biden, ridiculously partisan on both sides. If I haven't heard of the source, worth looking into the actors behind it first.Typical, attack the source but not the content.
www.independent.co.uk
Bit one sided that article though.Talking points…
WATCH: The 3 Trillion-ish Times the Media Has Used 'Bloodbath' in Reporting.
The bloodbath hoax continues to limp along, with fresh evidence emerging of the media's selective outrage when it comes to President Donald Trump, who
Typical, attack the source but not the content.
Ah, hypocrisy, thou art a cruel mistress...
No - nobody should be able too.
No one has a crystal ball but word is on the ground, at least in Michigan, the Dems are very concerned about Trump but resigned themselves long ago to get behind Biden rather than field another candidate - there was a belief Biden would be the only one to beat him - that’s come back to haunt them - the majority of Dems support Biden and will vote for him just to keep out Trump but feel he is too old to do the job. I wrote to family members back in December 2022 who work for the DNC and said I thought it would be a mistake if Biden should stand for a second term - it didn’t go down very well!
It's all noise. He won't be president again. His supporters are vocal and passionate but there aren't enough of them.
My 'unbelieveable Jeff' of this election is the other way round.
I know easier said than done but try your best not to allow the election of a President in a country over 3,000 nautical miles away and several time zones affect something as important as your personal mental health, unless of course you live there? Do you live there? If not one thing i’d suggest is to put this thread on ignore if the potential of Frump is affecting your mental health
