Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Should we Bring Back National Service?

Would you support a Form of Military Service? If so, what kind?

  • No, not in any form

    Votes: 115 52.8%
  • One month, as a voluntary, community based scheme

    Votes: 9 4.1%
  • One year, voluntary, community based scheme

    Votes: 19 8.7%
  • Voluntary military service for 12 months

    Votes: 17 7.8%
  • Compulsory community based military service for one month

    Votes: 14 6.4%
  • Compulsory military service for 12 months

    Votes: 46 21.1%
  • How old are you - 18-24

    Votes: 6 2.8%
  • 25-49

    Votes: 39 17.9%
  • 50-64

    Votes: 71 32.6%
  • 65+

    Votes: 28 12.8%

  • Total voters
    218
  • Poll closed .


Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,889
I'm sorry @Zebedee but what is this 'future conflict with Russia etc' that you are envisaging ?
I’m not envisaging anything thing. (I assume @Zebedee was an auto complete typo 😂)

This debate in the media/government circles is taking place because leading military personalities have warned that we are underprepared should NATO become embroiled in a regional conflict in Europe.



Latvia and Estonia (both NATO members) have very specific security concerns - one of which has prompted them in recent days to call for NATO forces to be bolstered and suggest conscription in NATO countries.

Not sure why people keep bringing up the Daily Mail - this has been reported across the board in MSM.


Are you forgetting the principle of Collective Defence? It won’t be Russia at our shores that will demand our troops are involved but Russia threatening the borders of of Latvia and Estonia …or any other NATO country.
 
Last edited:




Somethingdean

Active member
May 18, 2019
76
One assumes you have absolved your dear self from lifting a finger owing to your advanced years.

In which case......it's not your shout, is it?
It's never down to us citizens is it. The government decide such matters. I was lucky to never get conscripted, but I would've had to go to war, if that is what my government decided. There is no choice, that's the point.
That's how a functioning society works I'm afraid. Selflessness.
 


Boys 9d

Well-known member
Jan 3, 2012
1,796
Lancing
I voted No. BTW My age group was the first to benefit from the repeal of National Service in the 60s.
 


heathgate

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 13, 2015
3,471
I'm sorry @Zebedee but what is this 'future conflict with Russia etc' that you are envisaging and think we should be preparing for ?

I'm really struggling to think of a situation where Britain's safety will be improved in any way by having a few hundred thousand conscripts dug in along the coast of Britain. Future (and current) threats to Britain will be from terrorism, economic and technological attacks.
There are quite a few reasons behind various groups raising 'National Service' as an issue, but surely there is no case for it 'improving' Britain's safety :shrug:
Who's to say that a national service model would not include IT related roles?... our yoof, if little else, are wholly engaged when it comes to 'tech' themes.
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,880
I’m not envisaging anything thing. (I assume @Zebedee was an auto complete typo 😂)

This debate in the media/government circles is taking place because leading military personalities have warned that we are underprepared should NATO become embroiled in a regional conflict in Europe.



Latvia and Estonia (both NATO members) have very specific security concerns - one of which has prompted them in recent days to call for NATO forces to be bolstered and suggest conscription in NATO countries.

Not sure why people keep bringing up the Daily Mail - this has been reported across the board in MSM.

Sorry, that was a typo.

Generals trying to justify increasing their forces isn't really news, and there's absolutely nothing there about making Britain safer :shrug:
 




heathgate

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 13, 2015
3,471
I think if there was a major conflict that required drafts they'd be enough volunteers to double our military size.

Much is made of the size of our Army compared to our allies and potential enemies but I feel the British army is more about quality over quantity. Russia have shown that having one of the largest armies doesn't necessarily mean you'll be effective on the battlefield. Poor training, low morale, antiquated weaponry and poor military infrastructure has exposed them in their invasion of Ukraine.
Technology.... that's where it will be at.... flying and shielding against small battlefield drones... IT espionage.....
 


WATFORD zero

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 10, 2003
25,880
Who's to say that a national service model would not include IT related roles?... our yoof, if little else, are wholly engaged when it comes to 'tech' themes.

Numbers of staff (whether through National service or otherwise) isn't the limiter in technology, drones, espionage etc. It's budget constrained, something that isn't fixed by spending yet more money kitting out, training and maintaining a few hundred thousand conscripts.
 


birthofanorange

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 31, 2011
5,925
David Gilmour's armpit
I didn't say anything about soy milk "turning you gay". I just meant that if the younger generation weren't so busy spending their money on fancy drinks, they could be spending their time learning a useful skill, like firing a gun and constructing a fall-out shelter.
Wind-up....shirley? :ROFLMAO:
 




Tiger Barb

Active member
Jan 31, 2009
165
Finland (where else?)
I think there are a couple of questions that sit before this poll:

do you foresee this country being under direct threat from a foreign power in the next 5-10 years?
if so, should the country defend itself, way of life and values?
If yes, then how best do we best prepare for this?
If no, we dont need to do anything.
 


Scappa

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2017
1,378
On compulsory military service - only if those who complain about "the youth of today" being feckless/entitled etc go first and show us how it's done and lead the front line when shit hits the fan.
 


Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
7,296
Vilamoura, Portugal
Firstly, declaration that I'm old so it wouldn't affect me (cards on the table and all that).

I'm not quite sure how a voluntary community based scheme is of any benefit to the armed forces? What skills would you learn in the community that will benefit in the theatre of war.

I also don't see the benefit of it being voluntary community service because I can't see you getting any more people to commit to it than those that volunteer anyway. If you were going to do it should be compulsory. 6 months after finishing either sixth form or finishing your first degree. You could offer 6 months in one hit or two weeks a year for the next 13!

As for the military option, I believe this has been prompted by comments from Latvia. We are in a very different position as Russia isn't sitting on our doorstep and I guess Trump's recent comments may mean those countries in close proximity to Putin don't feel reassured that membership of Nato is all it's cracked up to be!!
Cooking, cleaning, washing up, first aid/nursing, driving/logistics, stacking and carrying boxes and crates, radio communications.
 




Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,889
Sorry, that was a typo.

Generals trying to justify increasing their forces isn't really news, and there's absolutely nothing there about making Britain safer :shrug:
You probably missed my edit but this debate is specifically taking place within the context of NATO’s responsibility under the principle of collective defence and what is happening in Eastern Europe.

Britain does not need to be under direct threat in order for our forces to be called upon to engage in direct conflict. Any NATO country under the direct threat of attack or attack requires a collective response from NATO members. It is not about making Britain ‘safer’ (at least directly - I mean some politicians argue that bombing Yemen makes us ‘safer’ so it depends on who you speak to) - the argument is that it is about us having the preparedness to play our part should any other NATO country comes under attack. (Which personally I think is very unlikely but it is a deterrent as much as anything I suppose).
 


Peacehaven Wild Kids

Well-known member
Jan 16, 2022
2,293
The Avenue then Maloncho
Yes. It should be compulsory. If there is a war, it is the job of the younger generation who are more able-bodied to defend our land. There can be no objections. I know the soy latte generation find the concept of self-sacrifice completely alien but it is a pertinent one. Remember the reason we are typing these words in English today is because of the brave heroes in the 1940s.

IMG_3456.jpeg
 


Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
7,296
Vilamoura, Portugal
I think there are a couple of questions that sit before this poll:

do you foresee this country being under direct threat from a foreign power in the next 5-10 years?
if so, should the country defend itself, way of life and values?
If yes, then how best do we best prepare for this?
If no, we dont need to do anything.
Any NATO country under direct threat, not just our country.
The answer to that is probably yes.
 




heathgate

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 13, 2015
3,471
Numbers of staff (whether through National service or otherwise) isn't the limiter in technology, drones, espionage etc. It's budget constrained, something that isn't fixed by spending yet more money kitting out, training and maintaining a few hundred thousand conscripts.
Less boots on the ground, more bums on seats.... a financial trade off.
 


Justice

Dangerous Idiot
Jun 21, 2012
18,730
Born In Shoreham
Cooking, cleaning, washing up, first aid/nursing, driving/logistics, stacking and carrying boxes and crates, radio communications.
Getting your legs blown off the government is then happy to see you begging on the streets homeless. You would have to have a screw loose to fight for this current mob.
 


Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
7,296
Vilamoura, Portugal
That is why the idea of community based schemes have been muted. Compared to Army Reserves, this would not involve people joining the army!

I think Cameron introduced something along the lines of a voluntary national service type scheme about a decade ago - not sure how successful it was though but the idea was to get young people engaged in something that would give them a sense of national pride-( Not that I’m advocating Cameron’s version)

All parties have favoured some type of national service/civic scheme

You mean "mooted", right?
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat
As a Voluntary option then I can see some benefits it would give teenagers the opportunity to grow away from home and to experience military life if it also provide some life training to give youngsters a leg up towards a job and it’s attendance was viewed positively by employers then it could be of benefit to all.
If they found it was not for them then after a year they can return home or just don’t sign up for it in the first place
My youngsters joined the Air Cadets and had a great time. My grandson did 6 months with the Princes Trust when he decided A levels weren’t for him part of the way through Sixth form.
There is plenty for youngsters to do voluntarily.
What I would like to see is a return to proper apprenticeships. We need builders, sparks, plumbers etc.
 






Zeberdi

Brighton born & bred
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
4,889


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here