global warming will cause climate change ....there will be more freshwater in the system which will result in more rain and snow , cooling sea temperatures and changing salinity levels will also exacerbate extreme weather situations , i was in the middle of a thunderstorm in the Blue Mountains in Sydney last week that was to be frank , biblical ....the eastern seaboard of Aus as mentioned elsewhere has been pummelled with rain of biblical proportions.
- probably about even with the monetary cost of climate change events.A better world for nothing? 150 trillion according to the UN.
UN Demands $150 Trillion to End Bad Weather | Frontpage Mag
(also known as 150% of the world's GDP)www.frontpagemag.com
All those in favor of giving the UN $160 trillion to save the planet say ”aye”…
It's $160 trillion now.
99.5 of 'researchers' who signed up to do 'climate research' achieve what they are asked to do omitting the 99.8% of actual causes of climate change, all of which have been changing the temp on planet earth for millions of years. Look after our environment? Yes. Ban fuels, cars, and globalise farming? No. Ridiculous nuclear options for a spectral demon.
climate.nasa.gov
Good question. Well presented. Deserves an answer. Why not ask them why they are ignoring what I am pointing out? I would be glad to get an answer. Or does this hysterical 'we are boiling' narrative with blood red weather optics on national TV to frame and prime people with applied psychology some kind of 'science' I have not heard of? It's a grift. Carbon Certificates were being traded like dodgy fags in the 90's. Every climate prediction since the 60's has fallen flat on its face time after time, the accelerated propaganda is all that has changed.Why is it that all these scientists around the world are working in cahoots to inconvenience British car drivers?
What do the likes of NASA have to gain from this?
Scientific Consensus - NASA Science
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s...
I'm curious where you get these ideas from ? Who should we listen to?
This is a pertinent quote from the NASA link I thought:Why is it that all these scientists around the world are working in cahoots to inconvenience British car drivers?
What do the likes of NASA have to gain from this?
Scientific Consensus - NASA Science
It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s...
"Evidence". I dunno, maybe 500,000 years of human existence which show no increase in temp due to people? Why not have a look at the methods now being used to measure 'temperature'. It's in the small print. You've been sold a pup.
Consider your perception. Starting 2024 years ago is myopic. Apart from the temporal fallacy, you need to open yourself to scientific counter-narratives to see if they have any validity or substance from a scientific viewpoint. Our planet is not 2024 years old, but many of our belief systems are.
Here's a few starters for 10. https://dailysceptic.org/2023/11/26/three-graphs-that-show-there-is-no-climate-crisis/, and the hilarious......https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/03/back-into-caves-cop28-president-dismisses-phase-out-of-fossil-fuels
Climate Crises, a Soros/Disney production. I have nothing more to add.
Is your argument that there is nothing we can do about the Earth warming up or that it isn't necessary to try.
