Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] Gary Lineker to step back from presenting MOTD



Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,096
West Sussex

Gary Lineker is to step back from presenting Match of the Day until an agreement is reached on his social media use - BBC statement.
It follows an impartiality row over comments he made criticising the government's new asylum policy.
In a tweet, the presenter had compared the language used by the government to set out its plan to "that used by Germany in the 30s".
 




AlbionBro

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,144
No winners at all. They all looked silly, the BBC, Lineker,Wright and all connected. I actually thought, that I watched it more closely than usual on Saturdays as you do when listening to radio commentary. If the BBC choose to bin him off and save a few pounds, not sure anyone would worry. Get Murray and Virgo in.
 




AlastairWatts

Active member
Nov 1, 2009
500
High Wycombe
I'm amazed that so much credence is given to Lineker's comments. If I were on the level of payment which he pockets I think I'd be keeping a lower profile. Nevertheless, if he wants to make his name in politics (which seems to be the objective) then let him stand in an election somewhere and see if he can convince the voters.
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
17,820
Deepest, darkest Sussex
I'm amazed that so much credence is given to Lineker's comments. If I were on the level of payment which he pockets I think I'd be keeping a lower profile. Nevertheless, if he wants to make his name in politics (which seems to be the objective) then let him stand in an election somewhere and see if he can convince the voters.
So only politicians are allowed to talk about politics?
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,529
West is BEST
No winners at all. They all looked silly, the BBC, Lineker,Wright and all connected. I actually thought, that I watched it more closely than usual on Saturdays as you do when listening to radio commentary. If the BBC choose to bin him off and save a few pounds, not sure anyone would worry. Get Murray and Virgo in.
Incorrect.
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,529
West is BEST
I'm amazed that so much credence is given to Lineker's comments. If I were on the level of payment which he pockets I think I'd be keeping a lower profile. Nevertheless, if he wants to make his name in politics (which seems to be the objective) then let him stand in an election somewhere and see if he can convince the voters.
Does pointing out racism mean one is declaring an interest in pursuing politics?
 
Last edited:




Wozza

Shite Supporter
Jul 6, 2003
23,629
Online
I'm amazed that so much credence is given to Lineker's comments. If I were on the level of payment which he pockets I think I'd be keeping a lower profile. Nevertheless, if he wants to make his name in politics (which seems to be the objective) then let him stand in an election somewhere and see if he can convince the voters.

"Wants to make his name in politics"?! The media picked up on a single Tweet, which might have been forgotten by now.

But the BBC made it lead story on the evening news, Radio 4 etc. The Mail splashed on it all week.

All the amplification came from the right-wing press in an attempt to paint him as a bad guy. It did not go well for them.
 


AlastairWatts

Active member
Nov 1, 2009
500
High Wycombe
So only politicians are allowed to talk about politics?
Not what I meant. But his position on MOTD gives his views an undeserved authority. I view this as a 'Clarkson' moment - somebody else suggested replacing him and then he'll have the absolute freedom to expound his views. Until - and unless - that happens I just wish he'd concentrate upon football
 


The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,529
West is BEST
“It’s not the rhetoric of 1930’s Germany, it’s not, it’s not, it’s not”


It is a bit though, isn’t it.

Let’s try and concentrate on what is being said rather than who is saying it.

We have a government willing to risk the safety of children to hang on to a few angry voters.

Anyone in the public eye who speaks up against that has my support.
 




AlbionBro

Well-known member
Jun 6, 2020
1,144
I'm amazed that so much credence is given to Lineker's comments. If I were on the level of payment which he pockets I think I'd be keeping a lower profile. Nevertheless, if he wants to make his name in politics (which seems to be the objective) then let him stand in an election somewhere and see if he can convince the voters.
Good point, not sure he would like the flack all politicians get. Who would he be like Arnie, Reagan or Eastwood?
 


Hugo Rune

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 23, 2012
21,624
Brighton
So only politicians are allowed to talk about politics?
I fort I lived in a democracy the last time I looked. It’s just my opinion. Fed up with this cancel culture trying to cancel everything, first of all they cancel asylum seakers, then Lineker then they cancel the Match of a Day. They are all the same, BBC, Lineker, Politicians, bin the lot!
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
50,124
Faversham
Not what I meant. But his position on MOTD gives his views an undeserved authority. I view this as a 'Clarkson' moment - somebody else suggested replacing him and then he'll have the absolute freedom to expound his views. Until - and unless - that happens I just wish he'd concentrate upon football
Nonsense.

He has no authority.

And he hasn't punched anyone in the face.

(talk about confirmation bias!)
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
50,124
Faversham
Good point, not sure he would like the flack all politicians get. Who would he be like Arnie, Reagan or Eastwood?
Who are you like?

I'm going: "Richard Littlejohn".
 






The Clamp

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jan 11, 2016
24,529
West is BEST
Not what I meant. But his position on MOTD gives his views an undeserved authority. I view this as a 'Clarkson' moment - somebody else suggested replacing him and then he'll have the absolute freedom to expound his views. Until - and unless - that happens I just wish he'd concentrate upon football
The law already gives him the absolute freedom to expound his views. He needs no further authority to do so.
 






Wozza

Shite Supporter
Jul 6, 2003
23,629
Online
I view this as a 'Clarkson' moment - somebody else suggested replacing him and then he'll have the absolute freedom to expound his views. Until - and unless - that happens I just wish he'd concentrate upon football
I assume you don't follow Lineker on Twitter? So where are you hearing his views?

I mean, it's not on Match of the Day, is it? He seems very focussed on sport when on TV.
 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
17,820
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Not what I meant. But his position on MOTD gives his views an undeserved authority. I view this as a 'Clarkson' moment - somebody else suggested replacing him and then he'll have the absolute freedom to expound his views. Until - and unless - that happens I just wish he'd concentrate upon football
So you think he, as a non-politician, should be barred from talking about politics?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here