Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Not ignoring it, just pointing out the 23 games before it were an improvement to that point, the anamoly that season was the 6 defeats, not the run at the end.Lies, damned lies, and statistics. You can cut this anyway you like, but you can’t just ignore 6 defeats on the spin. Fact is that after 29 games we were also on 33 points and heading for 43 points using your PPG method; a very slight improvement on the preceding season.
The key is game 31 was a season changer: Caicedo debuted, Mwepu came back from injury (and,I would add, Maupay dropped, but let’s not go there), 2-1 at Arsenal and off we went. You might say genius Potter for picking Caicedo, but he had the honesty later in the run to admit he should have played him earlier. Had he done so, it’s not too much of a stretch to say we might have pipped West Ham for a European place.
I am in minority of about one, I believe, who thinks Potter gets far too much credit for finishing 9th. Instead,, credit the acquisitions team for pinching MC from Man U and ask why GP waited till April to play him.
The trigger for that poor run was Dunk getting sent off in a very good display but defeat at OT. He missed Burnley and Duffy had to try to handle Weghorst and didn’t. And you’re right, throwing Caicedo and Mwepu really did change us and shake us out of the rut we found ourselves in.
But I want to be really clear, I’m not defending Potter here, I’m defending the season I mostly enjoyed and how well the team did, how the players really started to believe in themselves. I just don’t see those seasons as lacking improvement. It’s probably coming across as Potter-cult, it isn’t, I was less upset than most when he left as I genuinely felt someone could come in and continue the good work, it wasn’t all him, it was the players that had stepped up and improved. I was genuinely excited the moment RDZ was announced.