To be fair it was starting to click. His last 10 games contained a lot of goals - compared to RDZs there’s only 1 goal in it I think, except we are conceding more nowThe fact that RDZ is getting a SHEDLOAD more goals consistently out of the same group of players doesn't reflect especially well on GP, IMO.
Yet Swansman says we're bad at home because our fans are terrible......The bookies had us to go down at 2/1. Not 41 points and 15th in 19/20. That 2020 home stat, only 4 of those home games had a crowd. Funny that.
Where we finished isn't the only benchmark of what constitutes average or success. Where we are now is down to progress, continual improvement, it hasn't just happened. Even RDZ's brilliant 21 goals from 11 games has a symmetry with 24 goals from GP's final 11 games. 45 goals in 22 league games is unbelievable. It's all linked up.
I really like RDZ, I think he is more exciting, more engaging, tactically brave, determined and absolutely think he is going to continue to take us forwards. Already completely sold on him. Great bit of business we've done, to have RDZ lined up is just a work of genius as said before.
*windsock is the English transition, although your version is more amusing...but you said like five minutes ago they were bang average.
Oh right yeah, your quote about how changing opinions every five minutes is the way to go.
Here's another couple of quotes:
"If you change your mind all the time, you're fickle and making it very simple for yourself, and can not learn from being wrong in the past - because you never realise you get it wrong."
"There is a time to change your mind, after deep consideration of the facts available. However, spinning around like a *windcock in a tornado just to fit whatever narrative you have at the time only makes you a man without principles and steady ideas, which is pretty f***ing dumb not to mention silly."
Both these come from a Swedish philosopher, mr S. Wansman.
The fact that RDZ is getting a SHEDLOAD more goals consistently out of the same group of players doesn't reflect especially well on GP, IMO.
or maybe weathervane*windsock is the English transition, although your version is more amusing
What's a more acceptable sample size?Yes we were 4th, but you know we had only played 6 games right?
We beat Leicester 5-2, Leeds 1-0, West Ham 2-0 and on the opening day, Man Utd at old Trafford for the first time ever, 2-1. It was great. But objectively, we had some soft opposition on the days.
Leicester lost 5 of their opening 6 games, drew the other, and got beat 6-2 the following week by Tottenham.
Leeds lost 5 and drew 3 of their 8 games after our win at home against them. They have not won away all season.
West Ham lost 5 and won just one of their opening 7 games, 1-0 against Steven Gerards Villa.
Man Utd lost 4-0 to Brentford the following week, the new manager was just a bit behind schedule in readying his team for the season.
We also got a point at home to Newcastle who are hard to beat, and lost to Fulham away, no real shame in either of those results, but Fulham have not beaten any side currently higher than us in the table
You can prove anything with facts.In fact let’s have it right. Potter last 11 PL games vs RDZ 11 games
Potter - 24 GF, 8 GA. 7W 3D 1L
RDZ - 21 GF, 20 GA. 4W 2D 5L
This with bells on, he will be never successful with a big club because of thislot of talk about revisionism and the start to the season here. lets get back to the fact that, with a supposedly better squad, Potter is doing worse at Chelsea. supposed to have been about the man-managment, building up players mental strength yet they have been appalling at handling games. maybe thats because of player egos etc, doesnt change that he's taken them backward. perhaps the strengths and style of Potter works better with average players, getting more out of them, and fails to translate to those more established.
Sterling is supposedly on about £17m per year, and he only turns up for 20 games a season...Joao Felix. Sold for £113 million by Benfica to Athletico Madrid but not really come up to expectations. Now Chelsea want him on loan till summer. Will pay £11 million fee plus £6 million wages. Is any player, especially one who has not scored as many goals as expected, really worth £17 million for 20 games?
Same, I never liked the guy from a personality perspective, and I can't stand him now especially when he keeps saying what an amazing club Chelsea are and how great their fans are. His soul is sold and he is desperately trying to say the right things knowing most of them hate him. Yes he got us playing better football than Hughton and we needed to evolve but I would have happily seen him booted after those horror runs in his first two seasons. Ironically the Potter cult always used the "who else could do a better job" card to defend those miserable winless goal less runs and now we have all sees that Tony and the club are more than well tapped into the global manager talent market and there is ALWAYS someone out there who can do a good job.Is it ok to say that I never liked Potter much....
And that I really don't like him now.....
Every day when he drives past the silver cock in Dorking I reckon.The biggest shame in all this is that we’ll never know what GP would have achieved had he stayed, we don’t really know if what is happening under RDZ would have happened anyway.
I do wonder if GP might also ponder this from time to time?
He's not really taken them backward though;lot of talk about revisionism and the start to the season here. lets get back to the fact that, with a supposedly better squad, Potter is doing worse at Chelsea. supposed to have been about the man-managment, building up players mental strength yet they have been appalling at handling games. maybe thats because of player egos etc, doesnt change that he's taken them backward. perhaps the strengths and style of Potter works better with average players, getting more out of them, and fails to translate to those more established.
Don't think its fair to count all 11 games, as in his first 3/4 he was clearly trying to play with Potter's tactics. Counting from the Chelsea game would be far better.In fact let’s have it right. Potter last 11 PL games vs RDZ 11 games
Potter - 24 GF, 8 GA. 7W 3D 1L
RDZ - 21 GF, 20 GA. 4W 2D 5L
That’s his problem, he had 2 weeks after being appointed before his first game so more time than Potter had with his new Chelsea teamDon't think its fair to count all 11 games, as in his first 3/4 he was clearly trying to play with Potter's tactics. Counting from the Chelsea game would be far better.
Yup. It's remarkably positive on here but I feel like we are setting ourselves up for a massive fall. There will be times Solly can't hit a barn door, there will be times Ferguson looks 18 and there will be times Mitoma falls over his feet every time he gets the ball. There'll also be some serious drubbings you suspect.Graham Potter was fantastic for us, I have no complaints on his time here.
De Zerbi has picked up a squad in form and kept it going.
His stylistic changes have made watching us far more enjoyable.
However it is way too early to compare the two.
De Zerbi ball will stop being enjoyable, when we are shipping goals for fun and unable to hit the target again.
If that doesn't happen, then De Zerbi is a genius and he won't be here long.
Yep, I think we are going to get a rude awakening with a drubbing at some stage, how we recover from that will be interesting.Yup. It's remarkably positive on here but I feel like we are setting ourselves up for a massive fall. There will be times Solly can't hit a barn door, there will be times Ferguson looks 18 and there will be times Mitoma falls over his feet every time he gets the ball. There'll also be some serious drubbings you suspect.
It's really positive, exciting, but we need to reign it in a little. We are not a top 8 team that Potter was holding back, I'm certain of that.