Recent content by mattpenfold

Yes, and when you explain what business it is of yours I might answer. After all, you just said you did not care.

So you are saying that NSC allows and condones the promotion of cancer "cure" that have been documented as killing people. I want to make a formal complaint about your attitude. And really, such a public proclamation of wilful ignorance! Is it NSC policy for their mods to be ignorant ?

I may well be, but I am not one with blood on my hands like you.

It has been proved. However we have already established you are intellectually dishonest, as well as intellectually incapable of understanding the evidence I provided. I would suggest that is now is the time for you to go away, and think about your lack of honesty. And if you still can...

Personally I prefer the 1955. But the 1979 is still better than most other recordings.

I have provided what you asked for. That you refuse to accept that is intellectual dishonest on your part. Were it just that it would not much matter. You would just look like a lying idiot. But the psuedo-science you pushed kills people, and you know it does. That does matter, and makes makes...

Go read the literature. You asked for evidence, and it has been provided. You cannot have reviewed them in so short a time, so please do not pretend you have. Read them, and explain why they are wrong please. If you cannot get hold of some of those journals, ask and I cannot do so, I might...

There is also this, from a centre that SUPPORTS alternative treatments for cancer. http://www.cam-cancer.org/CAM-Summaries/Dietary-approaches/Laetrile/Is-it-safe Two key papers cited there are: Braico, KT, Humbert, JR, Terplan, KL, & Lehotay, JM. Laetrile intoxication: report of a fatal...

Me being abusive ? You are the one who does not care about people dying from cyanide poisoning from taking a cancer cure you promoted. Evidence of toxicity: Shragg TA, Albertson TE, Fisher CJ (January 1982). "Cyanide poisoning after bitter almond ingestion". West. J. Med. 136 (1): 65–9. PMC...

Badfish, You are promoting a "cure" for which there is zero evidence it works, but plenty of evidence it kills. Further, you will have Google before posting, and you will know this. You still cannot explain yourself. You complained because I called you wilfully ignorant, yet you clearly are...

You are promoting something that kills, and what is more you know that. I think calling you wilfully ignorant is warranted, and rather mild. I note you are still unable to explain your actions. I may have to revise my opinion you are merely wilfully ignorant and ascribed more malevolent...

For example, it took me less than five minutes to find this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amygdalin You will have done the same, so please do explain why you posted what you did. You know taking apricot kernels is potentially lethal and ineffective, and yet you still posted a link to a non...

I want you to explain why you promoted a cancer cure that is known to both kill and be a con. Are you just stupid, wilfully ignorant or someone with an interested in conning people and not giving a toss ? Wilfully ignorant would be my guess.

You could always make you own salt beef. It is not that hard. You just need to make up a brining solution of salt, sugar, saltpetre and flavourings, and steep a cut of beef in it for a week or so. You can do several cuts at the same time as the beef freezes well. Saltpetre can be a little...

The Age is an Australian newspaper, not a peer-reviewed journal. Care to explain how you got so confused ? And why you are promoting something that can potentially kill ? Apricot kernals contain cyanide, and it is quite possible to ingest enough to be fatal. And why you promoting something...