That's a ****ing pitiful response: Hiding behind a legal argument, rather than doing what I suspect you know is right, but you're just too cowardly to do (not you as an individual nut NSC in general)
Well, none of that's true.
2005 and 2010 BNP poll approx 4000
2010 Tories 7000
2015 UKIP poll 7000, the BNP had no candidate. I feel it's fairly safe to say that a lot of the BNP votes went directly to UKIP - the tories got 5000 that year, again those 2000 probably went to UKIP. So the UKIPs...
You make it sound like the whole of the northern working class vote the same way. Plenty of labour MPs in places that still have a bit of pride....like proper Lancashire cities like Preston
Would you mind if I ask why? And also how would you describe your politics. just maybe a couple of things that are important to you.
I ask because this is what i don't understand: I fully, and absolutely understand being disillusioned with labour, but I can't get my head around switching to...
So, let me get this right, you're a 'social liberal' who won't vote labour because of 'middle class champagne activism' and you prefer the tories, who are upper class etonians?
The 'man in the women's toilet' thing, is purely used by the far right to scare people about the trans community. It is a divide and conquer tactic.
I suspect you know this.
Nothing has ever stopped a man, dressing as a woman, and entering a women's toilet.
There's also biological women who...
Anything that's rooted in a genuine curiosity or question regarding trans people = not transphobic. Anything that demonises the trans community = transphobic (in my opinion, I do not speak for the trans community)
So for example, as you mentioned before, discussing whether or not trans people...
It's not designed to be a loaded question
hate speech is any speech that impinges on the freedoms of someone
Transphobia - anything that is said that impinges on the rights of the trans community
Specifically - I agree that it's not necessarily transphobic, which is why I said it was a gray area...
A few things to point out here is how this website frames the "cancelling" take Noah Carl for example: It's framed that he's banned for being right wing, where in reality he was thrown out for poor research methods and use of data.
Take Jordan Peterson who it's framed as being cancelled...
I'd argue that what Amber Rudd did was far more disgusting than what the students did but that's beside the point, the point is freedom of speech, and I'm yet to hear an example of something you can't say at a university etc
Sorry, yes, I don't think I was very clear there. What I meant that Amber Rudd was prevented from speaking because of her involvement in Windrush, not for something she said. They weren't banning her because they were worried that she would say something offensive, but for what she did...
But the majority of the woke thing, is just bullshit made up and blown out of proportion by the right. Take a look a Corbyn's policies (ignoring brexit ones, because that's a different matter)
https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50501411
Which ones of these are woke? Which ones would your...
I looked up the Amber Rudd thing, looks like she was cancelled for her support/ involvement in windrush. That was protest against a particular person, not stopping someone saying something.
As for a terf protesting a trans rights person, then it looks like everyone from all political...