Brighton (was) a historical town. Hove (was) also a historical town. In a way they (where) twins. Now it is one unified city under one unified administrative authority which is what i am saying.
But your talking about the past. Brighton and Hove is a city even if you dont call it one. Hove wouldnt be going back to being a town it would carry on exactly how it is seen now, in its unique way. Poeple in any city use the phrase going town. Like i said i think its a good idea but if poeple...
Do people actually understand what im saying because the way people are talking about it, i dont think you all are actually getting what change im suggesting.
I understand it can come across as a mad idea at first, but if you actually sit down and think about it, it makes sense. Alot didnt want Brighton and Hove to merge, but it was done to become bigger and better. What is Hoves status now? Its part of the city and it still will be. Its just a idea...
If the city dont want it then i don't. I think its a good idea and ive spoken to quite alot of poeple about it and when i explain it properly they get it.
Like i keep stating Hoves identity will not be lost. Its the complete opposite; Hove will thrive under the change because they will then become Hove in Brighton that will then gain more recognition for every single business, helping them financially and then helping the cities economy grow.
What I mean is we get overlooked. The city often doesn't get seen as Brighton and Hove, which then doesn't show our true size, pop ect and de-values us. Boundaries wont change. Like I said Hove will still be there but it'll officially come under Brighton. Hove status wont change its just...