Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] Unpopular Opinion - Our Window This Far



portlock seagull

Why? Why us?
Jul 28, 2003
17,199
Think we’ve had a decent window, with or without Polish additions. It’s who you get rid of sometimes more than who recruit.
 




dingodan

New member
Feb 16, 2011
10,080
That’s fair enough. I’m glad you’re happy and certainly agree with the bottom half of your post about future potential. I’m not convinced in the here and now we have the same strength in depth. And that’s experience, quality and numbers.

First team is more than adequate, it’s when the injuries start. No striker sub option at Everton because we don’t have one. Ryan with some questionable traits backed up by Steele/Walton. Rock solid central defence looking increasingly vulnerable.

Love the new style, and Potter is a gent. Live in hope that injuries to certain players don’t totally derail our season.

The future is bright it’s the Unknowns in the next 8 months with limited ready and experienced cover.

UTA

If the worst happened and we lost one of our forwards for a period of time, do you think we could present the same goal threat with Trossard, Izquerdo, Gross or Jahanbakhsh in behind the front man? When I look at that, they all have goals in them, especially if played in that position.

The one thing I would agree with you about perhaps, is experience. We need to improve on set pieces but that's an isolated issue, it's only been a recent problem. We have got a lot of players who have played for us for a few seasons in the PL. Lallana and Veltman bring bags of experience, above and beyond what we have had before too. Experience is useful for sure, I think we have a decent amount of it in the squad. We are also looking to younger less experienced players, but look at Lampty and Alzate, to name just two examples. Being young and hungry can also be useful, I tend to think what we have is a good balance of youth and experience.

I don't think we've looked all at sea or naive or devoid of ideas since Potter came in, quite the opposite. We are a well coached side and we play good football. We are even defensively solid, we don't get shown up at the back much at all. It's just the silly free kicks in dangerous areas and our dumbfounding (and hopefully temporary) inability to defend a set piece. But that's a small wrinkle in an otherwise very well executed change in style, and a change in style for the better. Much better.

Have faith. :smile:
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
17,971
Deepest, darkest Sussex
We've left ourselves light in a crucial area, had we landed another first team striker I'd be happy with our window, as it is I'm underwhelmed. And if Maupay and Connolly both tweak hamstrings at the same time in the next few weeks we're screwed.
 


um bongo molongo

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2004
2,703
Battersea
I think we look light. Veltman for Montoya and Lallana for Mooy probably upgrades, but not really taking us to next level. Our biggest problem was lack of pace/threat up front and we’ve done nothing to address it. I suspect 20-25M for Watkins/Wilson/Brewster won’t look that bad at the end of the season if they’ve earned their sides another 180M odd for staying in the Prem. Suspect we can’t compete because we’re still paying off the eye watering sums spent on Locadia, Ali J etc that haven’t strengthened our first XI. We’re one injury to Maupay away from being right in the thick of relegation again.
 


Seasidesage

New member
May 19, 2009
4,467
Brighton, United Kingdom
I think the business we have done is very good. But to go into the season, a season with the most truncated programme in recent history, without cover for our one established goalscorer in the squad is a risk there is no doubt about that. If Maupay was to get a bad injury it will be very difficult to find those goals elsewhere. I'm still confidant we can have a good season but there is a risk now if we get unlucky with injuries.
 




dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
15,025
London
I think the business we have done is very good. But to go into the season, a season with the most truncated programme in recent history, without cover for our one established goalscorer in the squad is a risk there is no doubt about that. If Maupay was to get a bad injury it will be very difficult to find those goals elsewhere. I'm still confidant we can have a good season but there is a risk now if we get unlucky with injuries.
It just beggars belief that we only have 2 first team strikers on the books, one of those a kid who's not really ready.

I've never heard of any team in any league being so light upfront. Utterly bizarre.

Sent from my SM-G977N using Tapatalk
 


Paulie Gualtieri

Bada Bing
NSC Patron
May 8, 2018
9,333
Agree with the sentiment that we have strengthened the production line for the future which should be commended however the fear of not strengthening in the now could put the project at risk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 






dwayne

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
15,025
London
It will interesting to see if Brighton and Burnley both stay up, and by some margin.

Shirley the two lowest net spenders, I’d love it if three spending merchants drop.
We may not have spent anything this window bit we've spent a hell of a lot in other windows.

Sent from my SM-G977N using Tapatalk
 


peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
11,380
If the worst happened and we lost one of our forwards for a period of time, do you think we could present the same goal threat with Trossard, Izquerdo, Gross or Jahanbakhsh in behind the front man? When I look at that, they all have goals in them, especially if played in that position.

The one thing I would agree with you about perhaps, is experience. We need to improve on set pieces but that's an isolated issue, it's only been a recent problem. We have got a lot of players who have played for us for a few seasons in the PL. Lallana and Veltman bring bags of experience, above and beyond what we have had before too. Experience is useful for sure, I think we have a decent amount of it in the squad. We are also looking to younger less experienced players, but look at Lampty and Alzate, to name just two examples. Being young and hungry can also be useful, I tend to think what we have is a good balance of youth and experience.

I don't think we've looked all at sea or naive or devoid of ideas since Potter came in, quite the opposite. We are a well coached side and we play good football. We are even defensively solid, we don't get shown up at the back much at all. It's just the silly free kicks in dangerous areas and our dumbfounding (and hopefully temporary) inability to defend a set piece. But that's a small wrinkle in an otherwise very well executed change in style, and a change in style for the better. Much better.

Have faith. :smile:

No I don’t think we could present the same goal threat with those midfield players.

They’re all capable midfielders and even with both Maupay and Connolly fit, they’ll score a few.

As I mentioned earlier somewhere, they are not instinctive strikers, they are not all going to arrive in the box at the right time and get the scraps and tap ins, Tross and Ali J are gonna score with a few decent shots, but they’re just not instinctive strikers......Think of the goal Maupay scored v Arsenal, the instinctive swivel in behind the defender, the flick from Connolly....Swap an injured Maupay with anyone of those midfielders and they don’t score that goal as that is an instinctive strikers movement for that goal imho.

We could still score and win games, but those 2 are the only natural strikers and they will both find goals in positions the midfielders wouldn’t.
 


Arkwright

Arkwright
Oct 26, 2010
2,795
Caterham, Surrey
It's been an okay window, my concern is that we are going to be too reliant on youth and lack experience.

All this talk of Trossard, Jakinbash or McAllister filling in as strikers is laughable it's like putting a round peg in a square hole, they are not strikers good enough for the Premier.
 






Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
64,313
Withdean area
We may not have spent anything this window bit we've spent a hell of a lot in other windows.

Sent from my SM-G977N using Tapatalk

£200m? over 7 transfer windows.

Villa spent £145m last season alone, Everton £600m over recent seasons, Fulham £105m summer 2018, Leeds £110m this summer.

Per season or window, TB follows a different path.
 
Last edited:


peterward

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 11, 2009
11,380
£200m? over 7 transfer windows.

Villa spent £145m last season alone, Everton £600m over recent seasons, Fulham £105m summer 2018, Leeds £110m this summer.

Person season or window, TB follows a different path.

We’re a pound shop Aston Villa :lolol:
 




Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,297
It's been an okay window, my concern is that we are going to be too reliant on youth and lack experience.

All this talk of Trossard, Jakinbash or McAllister filling in as strikers is laughable it's like putting a round peg in a square hole, they are not strikers good enough for the Premier.

Agreed. It’s been painfully obvious we need a left wing back and a striker. Shame that Nunez guy didn’t come off. But I don’t know the clubs’ stance / finances so I’ll trust in them - and the window for domestic isn’t closed so still may get a player or 2...
 




dingodan

New member
Feb 16, 2011
10,080
No I don’t think we could present the same goal threat with those midfield players.

They’re all capable midfielders and even with both Maupay and Connolly fit, they’ll score a few.

As I mentioned earlier somewhere, they are not instinctive strikers, they are not all going to arrive in the box at the right time and get the scraps and tap ins, Tross and Ali J are gonna score with a few decent shots, but they’re just not instinctive strikers......Think of the goal Maupay scored v Arsenal, the instinctive swivel in behind the defender, the flick from Connolly....Swap an injured Maupay with anyone of those midfielders and they don’t score that goal as that is an instinctive strikers movement for that goal imho.

We could still score and win games, but those 2 are the only natural strikers and they will both find goals in positions the midfielders wouldn’t.

Remember Trossards goal Vs Norwich, and the run required to get on the end of it? That's a strikers goal IMO.

His goal Vs Liverpool? Inside the box again, strikers finish that, again IMO.



 






sjamesb3466

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2009
5,182
Leicester
Could be worse, could be Burnley who have only signed Dale Stephens all summer. Decent midfielder many would agree but hardly a progressive forward thinking signing
Plus you'd live in Burnley
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here