Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
We'd have won that if Smug had been in charge!
He is a better manager than CH imo and it hurts me to say that.
We'd have won that if Smug had been in charge!
He is a better manager than CH imo and it hurts me to say that.
Always think a point gained where against a more expensive/illustrious team.
But not today, an hour against 10 men, at home.
Lack of subs by CH is pathetic.
He is a better manager than CH imo and it hurts me to say that.
He had 2 long term injuries back into the starting XI today, they were fantastic first half and hardly surprising he was cautious about how they faired when making subs. Got to say, they were MASSIVE positives for me today, the dynamism and toward play first half was as good as we’ve seen with Propper and Gross at the heart of everything. 2nd half was poor but I’d be delighted to see someone give Leicester some credit for how good they were second half.
They did the double over us last season so I see it as a point gained. We are at the start of our second season at this level so keeping us at this level is CHs job. As for moving to the next level wtf is that? Do we see us doing a Leicester?
We had chances to win that game then stood back and the inevitable happened.
Today we really should have won and I hope lessons are learnt from this.
How many times has this been said but things dont change.
Perhaps Chris would appreciate the transfer and wage budgets Smug enjoys before making that call. FFP Smug, anyone!!??
2 points dropped because it was a silly penalty to concede. Kayal had no need to dive in.
Apart from the penalty, Ryan didn't have a save to make. The defence did their job well.
The players have got to make better decisions when on the pitch. Isquierdo should have passed to Murray instead of shooting.
I think March and Andone should have come on earlier but we lost that fixture last season, so we have improved.
I’d appreciate Chris changing tactics mid game and having a positive set up now and again...just like Eddie
Bored with “we are too poor to be competitive”, it goes deeper than that imo, it’s a ready excuse trotted out everytime we underperform.
We weren’t positive for the first 50mins!?
How have we improved, we lost to 11 men last year, this year we got away with a draw against 10 having taken the lead. Amazed you can take a positive from that, actually no I’m not
First 40, that’s when the time wasting started, but games are 90 mins so no not good enough. Check how many late goals Bournemouth score and then check how many we score.