Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
Seeing that Ford had'nt built the Model T by then and China was an industrial powerhouse,how did the melting of the ice age happen ? How is this not a cycle as opposed to a change ?

Seeing that Ford had'nt built the Model T by then and China was an industrial powerhouse,how did the melting of the ice age happen ? How is this not a cycle as opposed to a change ?![]()
My God...you're right! How have those hundreds of professors and world leading scientists not thought of that! I hope to Christ that they read NSC at the UN commission on climate change otherwise they're going to look pretty stupid when it all turns out to be just one of those cycle things.
Those scientists are paid to tell us tha t global warming or climate change is caused by humans. It's their job to.
Climate change has become a huge industry with many jobs relying on what the 'scientists' claim.
Whether or not we are the main cause of climate change, I see very little reason to suggest we shouldn't recycle, we shouldn't cut down on energy use and we shouldn't cut down on waste (50% of all food produced going to waste).
Whether or not we are the main cause of climate change, I see very little reason to suggest we shouldn't recycle, we shouldn't cut down on energy use and we shouldn't cut down on waste (50% of all food produced going to waste).
ThisIs the right answer. Most of the sensible environmental actions are fairly painless, logical and useful in many ways. Denying climate change is for lazy people who can't be bothered to live in a more responsible way.
this is a fair point of view. however, when we are facing economic trouble should we be imposing green taxes, specifically designed to force down consumption by pricing energy upwards? when we are responsible for only 2% of energy, should we be bearing the brunt of efforts to reduce usage?