I can hardly say no I don't:-These allegations does any one realy believe them,
Will Jimmy Saville be another Robert Maxwell?
I can hardly say no I don't:-These allegations does any one realy believe them,
Did I read that he used his charity work for Stoke Mandeville as a lever for any threats to expose him? Write stuff about me and all that money flowing in will stop...
I could have sworn that you're innocent until proven guilty in this country. Silly me.
The sentiment is correct, but you need to understand the mistakes of the past so as not to repeat them in the future.I must admit I think JS is guilty but I think we should spend less time mouthing off about JS and rather think about making sure it doesnt happen again.
I was discussing this very fact with some chums last week. It truly turns the stomach. And now other high profile figures are being implicated. For example, apparently Ted Heath used to invite boys from that place onto his yacht at weekends. We'll now probably never know whether this is all innocent or not but Haut de la Garenne increasingly looks like it was looked upon as a play thing for the depraved.![]()
I have figured why i thought everyone new...the above picture was taken at Haut de la Garenne however in 2008 Savile protested that he was never there, had never been to this childrens home (even tho he had been to many others)
If your not sure of the significance
Jersey child abuse investigation 2008 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Whereas I think we should spend more time mouthing off various people at the BBC who stood by and let this happen. Janet Street Porter, Esther Rantzen to start off with, but there are dozens more.I must admit I think JS is guilty but I think we should spend less time mouthing off about JS and rather think about making sure it doesnt happen again.
The sentiment is correct, but you need to understand the mistakes of the past so as not to repeat them in the future.
But sadly the predatory nature of paedophilia and molestation makes it pretty much impossible to stamp out.
JSP is just a twat. I suspect Esther feels bad that she did nothing about her suspicions, but she didn't actually know. But an effort should be made to find out who actually knew.Whereas I think we should spend more time mouthing off various people at the BBC who stood by and let this happen. Janet Street Porter, Esther Rantzen to start off with, but there are dozens more.
It's difficult to maintain a sense of neutrality when so many people have come forward.
His family are removing his head stone, as I type.Agreed but that's exactly what the police and co should be doing. Let's hold off blowing up his grave, removing his knighthood and generally marking him as a guilty man until the police release their findings.
While I'm not suggesting that is the case, when someone makes a complaint, they are seen by a number of policemen / women, journalists if they want, their statements are taken, and they are part of the story. They can do all that and be part of it without giving authority for their name to be released. They get attention. It does happen with some people in some cases.Just a tiny point, how can women be attention seeking, when none of their identities are actually known?
Savile not Saville
Exactly. The clue is in the name.Savile. Makes it easy to remember.
If i decided to make accusations against a dead member of your family who would defend him
While I'm not suggesting that is the case, when someone makes a complaint, they are seen by a number of policemen / women, journalists if they want, their statements are taken, and they are part of the story. They can do all that and be part of it without giving authority for their name to be released. They get attention. It does happen with some people in some cases.