aftershavedave
Well-known member
I'm no great fan as I think it's overly camped up, which can be tedious, but here's a question:
As far as I can find, there were 58 votes allocated to each of the 39 competitors, which I make to be 2,262 votes to be allocated across the entries.
Now, to get 1 vote as a result would equate to something like 0.0004 of the total public votes. So to score 0 like we did (and some other, I can't remember who) would mean a crazily low score by the public. Even in elections the fringe candidates score "something" so how comes we got a zero?
Can anyone explain? Am I way out here?
Cheers
As far as I can find, there were 58 votes allocated to each of the 39 competitors, which I make to be 2,262 votes to be allocated across the entries.
Now, to get 1 vote as a result would equate to something like 0.0004 of the total public votes. So to score 0 like we did (and some other, I can't remember who) would mean a crazily low score by the public. Even in elections the fringe candidates score "something" so how comes we got a zero?
Can anyone explain? Am I way out here?
Cheers