Just seen the city second goal
How was that allowed?
Looked like Fulham seriously considered just walking off
How was that allowed?
Looked like Fulham seriously considered just walking off
[Albion] Premier League 1-3-9/23
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Recently sold Brighton players playing at other clubs in the Prem this weekend:
Tottenham
Chelsea
Liverpool
Arsenal
I could add Newcastle.
Just feels like some measure of how far we have come. Selling players, yes. But to the biggest clubs in the land. And still competing in the pitch.
Tottenham
Chelsea
Liverpool
Arsenal
I could add Newcastle.
Just feels like some measure of how far we have come. Selling players, yes. But to the biggest clubs in the land. And still competing in the pitch.
It's been an incredible weekend. Landing Barca's no 10, first ever Europa League draw and landing three huge ties, then yesterday booking my first ever travel for a Brighton European away day and stuffing the barcodes 3-1 before home for more beer, cheese and a win for CEJ in the boxing.
Hoping Palace lose today to make it a singing the blues weekend almost feels greedy. And they're bound to be confident having swooped to land the mighty Rob Holding for £4 million on deadline day,
Hoping Palace lose today to make it a singing the blues weekend almost feels greedy. And they're bound to be confident having swooped to land the mighty Rob Holding for £4 million on deadline day,
Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
Best to start booing them all I reckon
Dave the hatosaurus
Well-known member
You see this is my biggest problem with VAR, as highlighted on MOTD last night, the ones they get wrong that are SOOOO obvious.
The only possible reason that i can see why that goal was allowed was that the lino had not raised his flag (though only he and god knows why he did not) and VAR did not want to embarrass him. I mean what else could it be? (brown envelopes aside obviously!)
Coldeanseagull
Opinionated
Wolves win, Liverpool win. arsenal win
Don't like palace
Really don't like villa
Don't really like the buck toothed whinging knob head
Don't like palace
Really don't like villa
Don't really like the buck toothed whinging knob head
Dick Swiveller
Well-known member
- Sep 9, 2011
- 9,188
You missed Sanchez, Moises and Colwill losing whilst Gilmour was MoM in a game without a hattrick and Lamptey seemed back to his pacey best. We should have a statue of Todd's trousers, we have pulled them down so many times.
Also, in what world is Villa v Liverpool on at the same time and yet Sky go with Palace Wolves? That is a quota game if ever I saw one and week 4 seems a bit soon for that.
Ooh it’s a corner
Well-known member
What’s Janet Street-Porter got to do with it though?
Deleted member 37369
Well-known member
- Aug 21, 2018
- 1,994
Liverpool v Villa was moved to Sunday as Villa had Conference play-off v Hibernian on Thursday.
Uh_huh_him
Well-known member
- Sep 28, 2011
- 11,001
absolutely this.
There is also a more common bias, as to whether the decision will alter the most likely result.
The Luton one was a case in point.
West Ham have been in control, plucky outsider can nab a draw if I award this.
Similarly Michael Oliver in our game vs Brentford last season.
we had come back to get a draw with 1 VAR penalty, no chance we would be given a 2nd to win it. He waved away an absolute stone wall "hand away from the body" penalty. Shearer dismissed it with the "proximity" argument, which has nothing to do with the laws, since "deliberate" was removed.
Eze made a meal of it, but you can see the Wolves player has trod on a decent chunk of his foot.
banjo
GOSBTS
2-0.