Do you think I'm giving her too much credit?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Sussex] Katie Hopkins in Lewes
- Thread starter Not Andy Naylor
- Start date
Do you think I'm giving her too much credit?
hart's shirt
Well-known member
Well, she was never the same after marrying Tom Cruise...
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
There are surely more subtle and effective methods of dealing with this vile and hateful woman. Let her speak and let her sell her tickets, eventually those purchasing will notice the looks they get from decent folk when they mention they are going to see her. Sadly all this protesting and shutting her down breathes wind into the sails of the 'PC gone mad" brigade. Let her talk and let people make up their own minds about.
My guess is that beyond the hate, the controversy and the hoha she has very little of substance to say. Let her speak and prove once and for all that aside from a few lazy eyed cracks she really doesn't have much of an audience.
My guess is that beyond the hate, the controversy and the hoha she has very little of substance to say. Let her speak and prove once and for all that aside from a few lazy eyed cracks she really doesn't have much of an audience.
Bladders
Twats everywhere
Yup, if no one is interested in what she says no one will turn up
.... but if they do in numbers, then there must be a crowd for her message , whether you like it or not
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
What I like is neither here nor there, she is rarely on my radar. I don't think she has anything worthwhile to say so I rarely bother to read her cracked ramblings.
After the controversy and hype is removed and she is forced changed the delivery of her message he and her swivel eyed loon followers will be on the fringes of society and of no consequence to the rest of us. Without the hate, hype and protesters she is nothing and has nothing to offer decent intelligent debate. IMHO she just needs enough rope to prove this.
Of course I could be wrong, and when stripped of the hatful soundbites and hoha she could become an articulate, thoughtful and insightful social commentator . Either way society is improved.
Brighton Mod
Its All Too Beautiful
Bladders
Twats everywhere
Like many you claim not to read what she writes but have a firm opinion on her
You’ll be shocked that her and the those with the same leanings are followed by a lot more than just the fringes of society
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
Of course people agree with her message, this is why she posts her hyperbolic populist nonsense.
To be honest I think you are missing the point I am making. I am not criticising her message (although I disagree with it) I am criticising the way she delivers it. She is rude, hateful and disrespectful in her delivery, this is why I don't bother reading her. I would have thought that anyone with a bit of intelligence and decency who agreed with her message would distance themselves from her delivery at the earliest opportunity.
My assertion here is that is you strip away the hate, hyperbole and lack of manners she really has little to offer any of the debates she weighs in on.
Are you saying that behind the soundbites there is articulate and thoughtful information on the subjects she discusses?
Bladders
Twats everywhere
Sorry let me get this straight, she's rude , hateful etc etc but you don't bother reading what she writes .
Are you just a cucked sheep who has made a decision on what others have posted about her?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
I have read enough to work out that she is those things. You are taking this binary thinking thing to its limits here
You didn't answer my question though, if i were to read more would i find articulate, thoughtful and well reasoned arguments?
Can you cukold a sheep? Do they care enough?
You could have just invented a whole new genre of farmyard porn.
Last edited:
Bladders
Twats everywhere
I have read enough to work out that she is those things. You are taking this binary thinking thing to its limits here
You didn't answer my question though, if i were to read more would i find articulate, thoughtful and well reasoned arguments?
You haven't read any of it have you, you're just following the PC narrative like a good well behaved lemming .
Why don't you read more and find out for yourself, then maybe you can post more than the one article from a few years ago that's done the rounds on this thread .
There's loads of it out there . Go on .
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
Ok Mate
Bladders
Twats everywhere
Well you could start with her trip to Sweden , it's out there , and her talking to the frightened women there .
See how much "vile" " spewing" you find there
Ok mate .
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
This is output of hers that is respectful, articulate and well reasoned? I would be interested to read it can you stick a link up? or is it this one?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...PKINS-reports-Scandi-lib-paradise-Sweden.html
Good to see a bit of sensationalist hyperbole in the headline, she is off to a good start
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,296
"Freedom of speech" getting a bit too costly for the Mail now.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-5123073/Jacqueline-Teale-apology.html
Fake News !
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-5123073/Jacqueline-Teale-apology.html
Fake News !
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
[MENTION=24838]Bladders[/MENTION]
I read the article and you are absolutely right, is had far less hatred, bile and anger as her soundbites and the other stuff I have read. It was also a very harrowing account of her experiences, although I expect that she knew what she was looking for in order to write the article. Not much balance in there.
However I didn't find it very insightful and it prompted far more questions about the situation in Sweden than it answered. She talks about a lot of things without providing any evidence, she even talks about a graph she was viewing which she declined to include in the article. Same with peoples opinions that she failed to cite.
This suggests that my original assertion is fairly accurate. If you take away the hyperbole, virtue signalling and hatred she has very little offer.
Did you find the article different to this?
I read the article and you are absolutely right, is had far less hatred, bile and anger as her soundbites and the other stuff I have read. It was also a very harrowing account of her experiences, although I expect that she knew what she was looking for in order to write the article. Not much balance in there.
However I didn't find it very insightful and it prompted far more questions about the situation in Sweden than it answered. She talks about a lot of things without providing any evidence, she even talks about a graph she was viewing which she declined to include in the article. Same with peoples opinions that she failed to cite.
This suggests that my original assertion is fairly accurate. If you take away the hyperbole, virtue signalling and hatred she has very little offer.
Did you find the article different to this?
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 17,102
"Freedom of speech" getting a bit too costly for the Mail now.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/article-5123073/Jacqueline-Teale-apology.html
Fake News !
Very gracious of them to pay the court costs which one assumes were run up while the Mail were trying to fight her case instead of just admitting their fault at the beginning.
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,296