I never understood the outrage about this - surely their manifesto was stating that they wouldn't have tuition fees if they were elected to be the government, but they weren't elected to be the government. We didn't get a majority government, but we needed some kind of government so that we could move forward, and they helped provide that. If each party stuck to its manifesto, nothing would have gone through parliament and we'd have had to have another election, which isn't what the country needed after the financial crisis.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Lib Dems Manifesto
- Thread starter nicko31
- Start date
Correct, in the book Scott And The Arse Antics.....
Absolutely spot on. But so many people just don't understand politics unfortunately.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Yes, Maria Caulfield has a small majority, & was mainly voted in to get rid of Storming Norman.
The_Viper
Well-known member
You're right, selling out on your biggest manifesto points is fantastic politics I mean look at them now, the Lib Dems are booming! Thank goodness they understand politics eh?
ManOfSussex
We wunt be druv
A slim 733 majority in Eastbourne as well for The Tories to defend from Stephen Lloyd too.
Where has anyone on this thread said vote Tory because the Lib Dems lied ? It's discussing pros and cons for voting Lib Dem. Anyway, it's a bit rich coming from someone who can't be bothered to vote .... not even to spoil the ballot paper !!
I agree with you BUT the Lib Dems made a big thing of tuition fees so it should of been a red line even if it brought down the government. Instead their red line was a referendum on a half arsed version of PR.
jakarta
Well-known member
Nationally that is true but my late Father-in-Law was a Horsham District Councillor for many years in the 1980s' & 90's and they ran the Council during the 90's. Obviously they couldn't do too much in the big picture of things but locally my understanding is that the redevelopment of the centre of Horsham was very much their work (plus a big wodge of cash from Royal Sun Alliance of course).
Lincoln Imp
Well-known member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 5,964
...to which should be added the point that we would have had a straight repeat of 1974 where the biggest party won the follow up election. In 2010 that would have meant a Tory victory. Is that what the tuition fee moaners would have wanted?
Wrong-Direction
Well-known member
- Mar 10, 2013
- 13,416
Hands up, didn't vote last time as they were ALL lieing about brexit, Proved right! I've realised now although they're all c*nts, some are more c*ntish than others, shoot me for petes sake
Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk
They made a massive thing about abolishing tuition fees leading up the election. Not only did they go up but they TRIPLED. Not sure how much compromise went on there.
The Birdman
New member
Legalise cannabis and lead to this nice one Libs
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Which party is pete standing for?
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
not a great list of headlines on the right
Slightly confused as "this" is something that is happening already, under our current drug laws.
A mex eyecan
Well-known member
- Nov 3, 2011
- 3,308
and so do they all, so in that case best not vote for any of them
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,301
Cant bring myself to vote for them but smashing the lib dems over the head about tutition fees is a bit unfair.
They found themselves as a minority government within a right wing one. Read a few books and the levers of power were already working against them.The Tories made sure they just made up the numbers, even taking credit for some of their policies.
Sent from my LG-K520 using Tapatalk
They found themselves as a minority government within a right wing one. Read a few books and the levers of power were already working against them.The Tories made sure they just made up the numbers, even taking credit for some of their policies.
Sent from my LG-K520 using Tapatalk