Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

Conspiracy Theorists



mejonaNO12 aka riskit

mejonaNO12 aka riskit

Well-known member
Dec 4, 2003
21,497
England
So we're now going on a theory that amazing computer graphics were used (in 2001), thousands of people involved, millions spent hiding all the evidence......... but the person doing the graphics well in advance forgot to remove the plane nose coming out the other side :lolol:
 




BadFish

BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,102
mejonaNO12 aka riskit said:
So we're now going on a theory that amazing computer graphics were used (in 2001), thousands of people involved, millions spent hiding all the evidence......... but the person doing the graphics well in advance forgot to remove the plane nose coming out the other side [emoji38]ol:
Click to expand...
.... And no one checked. If only the government had access to a huge industry that creates CGI on a daily basis. This is really what I am really struggling with, it just makes no sense.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 


Goldstone1976

Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Apr 30, 2013
13,783
Herts
Triggaaar said:
I actually thought we weren't allowed more than one account, am I mistaken?
Click to expand...

That's not a rule that I was made aware of when I was asked to be a mod. What is definitely frowned upon is the creation of another account simply to argue against/support your main account. Otherwise, afaik, if you want to create a second (or more) account(s) you can do so, providing those accounts behave in a way that is consistent with NSC's more general rules of behaviour.

We all know of parody accounts, and second accounts that come out for WHC, after all...
 


Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,167
Goldstone
Goldstone1976 said:
That's not a rule that I was made aware of when I was asked to be a mod...
Click to expand...
Not sure where I've got that from, I feel kinda silly for only have one account now. Expect another shortly.

We all know of parody accounts, and second accounts that come out for WHC, after all...
Click to expand...
Yeah I didn't think they were allowed either, but thought the mods just couldn't be bothered to stop them :)
 


Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,167
Goldstone
Megazone said:
Can anyone get a conspiracy thread from 5/6 years ago? I bet a million quid it'll have all the exact same users as this thread using the exact same insults towards the tinfoil hatters.
Click to expand...
colinz said:
http://www.northstandchat.com/showt...nding-discus&p=4707323&viewfull=1#post4707323
Click to expand...
:lol: that's pretty funny. colinz and I had an identical discussion there. I don't think I used any insults though, sorry Mega. I showed some footage showing that the footage wasn't faked, and colinz didn't reply. I think he's frightened to question his own bias.
 




BadFish

BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,102
Triggaaar said:
Not sure where I've got that from, I feel kinda silly for only have one account now. Expect another shortly.

Yeah I didn't think they were allowed either, but thought the mods just couldn't be bothered to stop them :)
Click to expand...
I thought they just turned a blind eye when the accounts were harmless. Now I am being too suspect a conspiracy. Maybe it is me you and 1000's of Bozza's different personalities.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 


Goldstone1976

Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Apr 30, 2013
13,783
Herts
BadFish said:
I thought they just turned a blind eye when the accounts were harmless.
Click to expand...

In practice, that's not a million miles away from me not having been informed of a rule against second accounts...

Whether there was once a rule against them that morphed into "if they're harmless, let them be", I'm not sure, but the effect is the same...
 


Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,167
Goldstone
Goldstone1976 said:
That's not a rule that I was made aware of when I was asked to be a mod. What is definitely frowned upon is the creation of another account simply to argue against/support your main account. Otherwise, afaik, if you want to create a second (or more) account(s) you can do so, providing those accounts behave in a way that is consistent with NSC's more general rules of behaviour.

We all know of parody accounts, and second accounts that come out for WHC, after all...
Click to expand...
Are people using web based email addresses for their second accounts?:

Bozza: "NSC does not permit web based email addresses to be used for new registrants."
 




BadFish

BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,102
Goldstone1976 said:
In practice, that's not a million miles away from me not having been informed of a rule against second accounts...

Whether there was once a rule against them that morphed into "if they're harmless, let them be", I'm not sure, but the effect is the same...
Click to expand...
Nothing to say about the conspiracy theory......... Interesting.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
 




Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,167
Goldstone
Goldstone1976 said:
Whether there was once a rule against them that morphed into "if they're harmless, let them be", I'm not sure, but the effect is the same...
Click to expand...
Does this new account seem harmless?:

"hello knob head moderator !! why would you ban me for a few harmless banter comments???? could it be that you are a pathetic little cock on a power moderator power trip. let me tell you this , i'm a boomerang and will keep coming back to your silly and pathetic page as and when i choose :lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol::lolol: ****."

"they did ban me but im back you pathetic little pond life"

"IM Back Knob Head !!!!!!"


What is that user adding to the board, apart from insults? And why not ban their main account too?
 




C

colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
Triggaaar said:
:lol: that's pretty funny. colinz and I had an identical discussion there. I don't think I used any insults though, sorry Mega. I showed some footage showing that the footage wasn't faked, and colinz didn't reply. I think he's frightened to question his own bias.
Click to expand...

What footage ?
 


C

colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
One Love said:
I wasn't going to bother as I thought it was obvious. The fact that you misinterpreted speaks volumes about you.

My explanation is that in my opinion you are so keen on disproving the common view held on something that you are prepared to follow any alternative that goes against it.

On another post you seem to believe that your input has been enlightening people. Whereas I believe you are doing the opposite.
Click to expand...

Any alternative that goes against what ?
I think I've only commented about 9/11. Other stuff which people say is faked such as the Las Vegas shooting doesn't interest me.
Unless it's going to be used as an excuse to bomb the shit out of (killing women, children & innocent civilians) then invade another country.
 


O

One Love

Well-known member
Aug 22, 2011
4,362
Brighton
colinz said:
In this video (from 12 minutes and 30 seconds) Ace Baker describes how the mistake with the 'Nose out' happened. The footage was both part pre fabricated and part Live.

Click to expand...


So you assume that the powers that be, don't tell the truth and make shit up but this guy doesn't.
 






C

colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland


Triggaaar

Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
50,167
Goldstone
colinz said:
What footage ?
Click to expand...
I hadn't appreciated that we'd been through this before. I don't know what you believe, but you've decided you won't accept the overwhelming evidence that planes hit the towers, you will only listen to conspiracy theories, so there's not much point in anyone explaining things to you, you have closed your mind. You can find the post.
 


C

colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
Triggaaar said:
I hadn't appreciated that we'd been through this before. I don't know what you believe, but you've decided you won't accept the overwhelming evidence that planes hit the towers, you will only listen to conspiracy theories, so there's not much point in anyone explaining things to you, you have closed your mind. You can find the post.
Click to expand...

You find the post you lazy fuk.

What over whelming evidence ? Don't you bother reading any thing. You've now back tracked over half the things you said. The plane didn't go through the Tower. The only footage which matters is what was shown live. And you still haven't been able to explain the Physics behind it.

Try and find some plane wreckage. May be you can start with the Pentagon crash.
 






C

colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
One Love said:
So you assume that the powers that be, don't tell the truth and make shit up but this guy doesn't.
Click to expand...

If you look at the video he explains the absurdity of why the plane penetrates the other side of the Tower. Even the news anchor says the plane went through the building.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here