Dick Swiveller
Well-known member
- Sep 9, 2011
- 9,155
Already have metal detector wands in 1901 and have for quite a while. There was a period where you had to remove keys, coins and phone beforehand as well but they now tend not to bother.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Albion fan issued with five game ban after social media post
- Thread starter Bozza
- Start date
Horses Arse
Well-known member
'Interestingly' (no, not really) someone else is picking up the batton and sending tweets about cyrille regis. Not sent to the club though - wonder what the response will be this time, and the next and so on.
sussex_guy2k2
Well-known member
- Jun 6, 2014
- 3,733
Right. But it’s about health and safety. You understand that, right? And yet one of the things which could cause most damage is being allowed in because it benefits the club. You get this, right?
- Apr 5, 2014
- 23,530
Unfortunately the price we pay for open discourse through modern technology is that it always involves immature and dickish behavior at some stage. So be it. It's the weighing of the effects of that behavior that should then give a sensible reference to law.
Platforms like Twitter are frustrating as we are exposed to views that may interrupt the line of conversation we want to sensibly engage in. Again, so be it.
If the person in question makes offensive remarks, and being offended is not exclusively the remit of a 'snowflake', most folk should be aware through their annoyance that said dickhead's remarks do not constitute a wider view.
There seems to be an inconsistency here. I have seen much in Twitter that would mean hundreds of bans from many clubs if there was an even application of the iron fist. But much goes unreported. I'm not sure that it is for the club to issue a ban as the reputation hasn't been besmirched among rational thinking folk- and they form the overwhelming majority.
Club 1 Dickhead 0
But I think VAR may have been used. Very Authoritarian Rationale.
Platforms like Twitter are frustrating as we are exposed to views that may interrupt the line of conversation we want to sensibly engage in. Again, so be it.
If the person in question makes offensive remarks, and being offended is not exclusively the remit of a 'snowflake', most folk should be aware through their annoyance that said dickhead's remarks do not constitute a wider view.
There seems to be an inconsistency here. I have seen much in Twitter that would mean hundreds of bans from many clubs if there was an even application of the iron fist. But much goes unreported. I'm not sure that it is for the club to issue a ban as the reputation hasn't been besmirched among rational thinking folk- and they form the overwhelming majority.
Club 1 Dickhead 0
But I think VAR may have been used. Very Authoritarian Rationale.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
This happened at Wembley last season when we played Spurs.
RandyWanger
Je suis rôti de boeuf
Getting into West Ham last week, you go through a tent and then the guy asks if you have anything in your pocket to which I replied YES, keys, wallet, phone and he waved me on 
Not even a pat down or wave with the wand.
Not even a pat down or wave with the wand.
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
Do they shout " expelliamus" when they point it at you?
Why ? The Bernard Manning tribute guy has sold Dicks out in March.
Nottseagull
Well-known member
Do you mean "but won"? If not, how is it another example?
Quite ironic you put that (unique in my experience) error in that particular sentence!)
No, the photographer lost. It's another example of someone being sued because they refused to do what the customer asked for, but the result was different to the cake case.