Bridders coming home?

dejavuatbtn · Dec 7, 2015

I thought he had potential but, like him, he found out that he wan't as good as he thought he was. Poorly exposed in premier games I saw him in on TV. In hindsight he would have been better off graduating towards the premiership with us, rather than being dropped in it with Sunderland. Gus did him no favours there.
No, He has shot his bolt as far as I am concerned.

Pavilionaire · Dec 7, 2015

More likely to sign for a rival Championship club and relish getting stuck into us than eating some humble pie and buying into Hughton's team ethic. I wouldn't sign him if he was on a free.

Wozza · Dec 7, 2015

No, thanks. He's not Premier League ready.

Cowfold Seagull · Dec 7, 2015

London Irish said:
We don't play that third centre back role any more that Gus loved, our centre mids have to be box to box, so it's a no from me because Bridders is an average attacking player

An average attacking player?, he is a bloody awful attacking player, he got a nose bleed every time he ventured into the oppenents half! Only scored seven goals in getting on for 150 appearances for the Albion.

He did a pretty good job in a very restriced role for the club, but the make up of the team is very different now, and it's time for everyone to move on.

Paul Reids Sock · Dec 7, 2015

Cowfold Seagull said:
An average attacking player?, he is a bloody awful attacking player, he got a nose bleed every time he ventured into the oppenents half! Only scored seven goals in getting on for 150 appearances for the Albion.

He did a pretty good job in a very restriced role for the club, but the make up of the team is very different now, and it's time for everyone to move on.

To be fair though - at least two of those goals were ruddy brilliant!

Although he may have just wanted to kick the ball so hard that he could then jog back to his happy place (halfway line)

Cowfold Seagull · Dec 7, 2015

BensGrandad said:
There is going to be games where CH will not want to go with 2 wide men.

Yes I quite agree, there will be plenty of away games when that will be the case, like next Saturday at Derby for instance, where Hughton will probably elect to sacrifice a winger for an extra midfield player.

That said ,the re-signing of Liam Bridcutt, and the very restricted role that he plays, really isn't the answer. He did himself no favours with the way he sulkily downed tools to force his departure to Sunderland either.

Kosmonaut · Dec 7, 2015

How times change, barely more than a year ago we were all describing him as practically the messiah and comparing him to Real Madrid players.

Cowfold Seagull · Dec 7, 2015

Paul Reids Sock said:
To be fair though - at least two of those goals were ruddy brilliant!

Although he may have just wanted to kick the ball so hard that he could then jog back to his happy place (halfway line)

He probably needed a map and compass to find his way back to the half way line!, and yes I remember those two screamers he scored for us at Withdean, but at the end of the day a goal is a goal, whether it's a shot into the top corner from 30 yards, or it goes in off your derrier.

Bombadier Botty · Dec 7, 2015

Why doesn't he come and clean the Amex toilets for a couple of months to pay back the wages he 'stole' from us during his final weeks at the club. With his dinky little arms he could get right up and round the u-bends no bother.

The Birdman · Dec 7, 2015

I would only have players back who would fit into the team spirit as I think it has been very good this season which has also helped us with this run.

Turkey · Dec 7, 2015

Disagree with the majority of people on this one.

If we were to lose Kayal and/or Stephens we don't have the sufficient quality to replace them. We saw that in the Preston home game. I'll be disappointed if we don't invest in a midfielder in the transfer window - and I know we have Towell who I hope is brilliant but is currently unproven at this level.

Bridcutt was brilliant for us, one of the best midfielders in the league. He wouldn't replace Kayal or Stephens but he'd be on hand to cover if needed and he'd also give us the option of changing to 4-3-3/4-5-1 if we needed too. Yes, we have Ince, but Ince is a very different player to Bridcutt. It's all about options and as we've shown already we can mix it up and play in different ways when we need too.

As for how he left, wasn't it actually Nathan Jones saying he didn't think Liam was focussed enough to play, rather than Liam saying it? They probably new he was going to be leaving and wanted to start playing the players who would be here in February. Seen enough of these sort of stories over the years to know there's two sides to every story and it's not always as black and white as people like to make out and remember it as. Besides, with Nathan still at the club, I somehow doubt we'd sign Bridcutt if he thought he wouldn't be good for the group.

So if there is any truth to this and we signed him, personally I'd be absolutely delighted. Bridcutt was class for us, to see him in a midfield with Kayal and Stephens if we needed to set up that way would be awesome.

Munkfish · Dec 7, 2015

Turkey said:
Disagree with the majority of people on this one.

If we were to lose Kayal and/or Stephens we don't have the sufficient quality to replace them. We saw that in the Preston home game. I'll be disappointed if we don't invest in a midfielder in the transfer window - and I know we have Towell who I hope is brilliant but is currently unproven at this level.

Bridcutt was brilliant for us, one of the best midfielders in the league. He wouldn't replace Kayal or Stephens but he'd be on hand to cover if needed and he'd also give us the option of changing to 4-3-3/4-5-1 if we needed too. Yes, we have Ince, but Ince is a very different player to Bridcutt. It's all about options and as we've shown already we can mix it up and play in different ways when we need too.

As for how he left, wasn't it actually Nathan Jones saying he didn't think Liam was focussed enough to play, rather than Liam saying it? They probably new he was going to be leaving and wanted to start playing the players who would be here in February. Seen enough of these sort of stories over the years to know there's two sides to every story and it's not always as black and white as people like to make out and remember it as. Besides, with Nathan still at the club, I somehow doubt we'd sign Bridcutt if he thought he wouldn't be good for the group.

So if there is any truth to this and we signed him, personally I'd be absolutely delighted. Bridcutt was class for us, to see him in a midfield with Kayal and Stephens if we needed to set up that way would be awesome.

Couldn't agree more.

Sussex Nomad · Dec 7, 2015

Turkey said:
Disagree with the majority of people on this one.

If we were to lose Kayal and/or Stephens we don't have the sufficient quality to replace them. We saw that in the Preston home game. I'll be disappointed if we don't invest in a midfielder in the transfer window - and I know we have Towell who I hope is brilliant but is currently unproven at this level.

Bridcutt was brilliant for us, one of the best midfielders in the league. He wouldn't replace Kayal or Stephens but he'd be on hand to cover if needed and he'd also give us the option of changing to 4-3-3/4-5-1 if we needed too. Yes, we have Ince, but Ince is a very different player to Bridcutt. It's all about options and as we've shown already we can mix it up and play in different ways when we need too.

As for how he left, wasn't it actually Nathan Jones saying he didn't think Liam was focussed enough to play, rather than Liam saying it? They probably new he was going to be leaving and wanted to start playing the players who would be here in February. Seen enough of these sort of stories over the years to know there's two sides to every story and it's not always as black and white as people like to make out and remember it as. Besides, with Nathan still at the club, I somehow doubt we'd sign Bridcutt if he thought he wouldn't be good for the group.

So if there is any truth to this and we signed him, personally I'd be absolutely delighted. Bridcutt was class for us, to see him in a midfield with Kayal and Stephens if we needed to set up that way would be awesome.

And what would happen when he's not needed? Which in a 4-4-2 seems quite regular this season? Would he go off sulking and asking for a transfer? He has pretty much shown his card when he's had enough. I don't think anyone has denied his brilliance in the stripes, but you have to admit he burnt bridges, the kind that don't get repaired. Ince is part of the squad and is prepared to come in when we bolster the midfield. Would Bridcutt be so willing? I doubt it personally. Despite him being a very, very classy defensive midfielder, I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.

chucky1973 · Dec 7, 2015

would be a great additional to the squad, 2-1 up with 10 to play...there's not many better at breaking up play than him.

There's worse about.

Turkey · Dec 7, 2015

Sussex Nomad said:
And what would happen when he's not needed? Which in a 4-4-2 seems quite regular this season? Would he go off sulking and asking for a transfer? He has pretty much shown his card when he's had enough. I don't think anyone has denied his brilliance in the stripes, but you have to admit he burnt bridges, the kind that don't get repaired. Ince is part of the squad and is prepared to come in when we bolster the midfield. Would Bridcutt be so willing? I doubt it personally. Despite him being a very, very classy defensive midfielder, I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.

That's making a lot of assumptions about Liam's character that you don't know to be true. Rumours and misquotes quickly become fact. As I said, the club know what happened, Nathan Jones knows what happened. If the club and Jones were both happy for Liam to return then I'd hope people on here would pipe down and support him.

As for not needed - who is to say Kayal or Stephens wont suffer a serious injury at some point this season? We would be buggered without them. It's a weakness in our squad, like the left back position, that we need to strengthen.

Buzzer · Dec 7, 2015

Bridcutt is a good player at this level if he has support from a bigger team player in the middle prepared to do the boring stuff and do it well. I think Bridcutt struggled in the first season in the Championship because he was too small and left isolated against much bigger teams. He really came into his own when he had Hammond alongside him who was able to provide the muscle and allow Bridcutt the freedom to express himself. Saying that, it's clear he can't cut it at a higher level than this, I think we've got players that are as good as him and we don't play to the style he was so successful at here. And he's burned his bridges as far as I'm concerned.

We've all moved on, he's Albion history and that's where I think he should stay.

Monkey Man · Dec 7, 2015

I loved Bridders when he played for us. He made everything tick. Hardly any move got going without him orchestrating it from the back. These days, Kayal and Stephens do that job, a bit further up the park.

Is Bridcutt too specialist a player for his own good? If so, is that Poyet's fault for moulding him that way? The guy is a huge talent but he's hopelessly typecast. I can't really see what we'd gain from him now, or what he'd gain from us.

Icy Gull · Dec 7, 2015

He would definitely make our squad stronger and increase options, The fans not accepting him would be the biggest problem, we don't need to be booing or having a go at our own players this season.

sir albion · Dec 7, 2015

We don't do defensive midfielders and don't really need any bar the bench for the last 20 at a push....bollocks to him anyway and don't want him anywhere near the club and bloom will say the same I'm sure

Turkey · Dec 7, 2015

Icy Gull said:
He would definitely make our squad stronger and increase options, The fans not accepting him would be the biggest problem, we don't need to be booing or having a go at our own players this season.

I think Hammond was hated more much more than Bridcutt and we supported him when he returned. If Bridcutt came in and helped us win football matches no one would be booing him. As for [MENTION=5200]Buzzer[/MENTION]'s comments about not good enough for Prem. 1, not every moves works, might do well with a different club in a different situation and 2, what if we just got him on loan till the end of the season instead? The 100m+ we'd make from promotion would more than pay for the cost of bringing him in.

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Bridders coming home?

Well-known member

Well-known member

Shite Supporter

Fan of the 17 bus

Well-known member

Fan of the 17 bus

Proud Hoveonian

Fan of the 17 bus

Complete Twaddle

New member

Well-known member

Well-known member

Well-known member

New member

Well-known member

Languidly Clinical

Your support is not that great

Back on the rollercoaster

New member

Well-known member

Share this page