No, because the goalkeeper wasn't challenged by an opponent. The opponent stood there, and the keeper fell on him.It's a foul unfortunately according to the laws
"IFAB's Law on indirect free kick offences says that:
[a] goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball when:
the ball is between the hands or between the hand and any surface (e.g. ground, own body) or by touching it with any part of the hands or arms except if the ball rebounds accidentally from the goalkeeper or the goalkeeper has made a save
...
In the situation described in the question, the goalkeeper is deemed to be in control of the ball.
The attacker would be committing a foul, since according to the same Law,
[a] goalkeeper cannot be challenged by an opponent when in control of the ball with the hands."
The commentators were guessing what it could be, as it didn't make sense. He hadn't fouler the defender either.
That was the only one that worked as Henderson wasnt getting the passes made like he usually does and when Dier came on he started finding the wings with his passes and we looked a lot better. The other was too little too late.
