Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

BHA January transfer watch



A

atomised

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2013
5,119
He hasnt necessarily achieved much but then nor has Mason. Fees arent always.decided on achoevement potential comes into it too. Outside of this season what had Blackman achieved.

How do you judge achievement. In Bamfords case perhaps his successful loan spell at Boro where he scored far more consistently than Mason ever has
 














A

atomised

Well-known member
Mar 21, 2013
5,119
BensGrandad said:
As I said I have no idea of his value.
Click to expand...

Yet youve made comment without bothering to research it. 17 for boro last season. 8 for.derby the season before in less games and I believe 19 for mk dons before that. 1 in 2 goals to games ratio
 


Bob!

Bob!

Coffee Buyer
Jul 5, 2003
11,153
BensGrandad said:
They must be mad they have let Lewis McGuggan go from their midfield and aim to replace him with Ince, no logic whatsoever.
Click to expand...

Weren't we looking at a left back from Wednesday?

mutual deal?
 






B

Betfair Bozo

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2007
2,098
Marshy said:
I bet they want 5 at least and thats being optimistic
Click to expand...

If they let him go for as little as £5m you can be sure they will insist on a buyback.

My guess would be around £8m. And were it not for the disappointing spell in the Prem with Palace it'd be a load more.
 










M

Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
16,705
Fiveways
Betfair Bozo said:
If they let him go for as little as £5m you can be sure they will insist on a buyback.

My guess would be around £8m. And were it not for the disappointing spell in the Prem with Palace it'd be a load more.
Click to expand...

You might have said that about De Bruyne and Lukaku, but they didn't even insert a sell-on fee. Which looks a bit stupid now.
 


B

Betfair Bozo

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2007
2,098
Machiavelli said:
You might have said that about De Bruyne and Lukaku, but they didn't even insert a sell-on fee. Which looks a bit stupid now.
Click to expand...

All the more reason to do so on this occasion. They got those two for (relative) peanuts and I am sure they were as surprised as anyone when De Bruyne went for £55m! I think they did ok getting £28m for Lukaku though in truth.
 






C

crookie

Well-known member
Jun 14, 2013
3,313
Back in Sussex
Betfair Bozo said:
All the more reason to do so on this occasion. They got those two for (relative) peanuts and I am sure they were as surprised as anyone when De Bruyne went for £55m! I think they did ok getting £28m for Lukaku though in truth.
Click to expand...

I read in the Standard yesterday that they did have sell on fees on De Bruyne, made millions out of the deal
 




M

Machiavelli

Well-known member
Oct 11, 2013
16,705
Fiveways
Betfair Bozo said:
All the more reason to do so on this occasion. They got those two for (relative) peanuts and I am sure they were as surprised as anyone when De Bruyne went for £55m! I think they did ok getting £28m for Lukaku though in truth.
Click to expand...

Do you still think that about Lukaku? He looks awesome to me -- pace, power, strength, height, movement, goals, age on his side; that rare breed these days, someone that can lead the line on his own.
 






B

Betfair Bozo

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2007
2,098
Machiavelli said:
Do you still think that about Lukaku? He looks awesome to me -- pace, power, strength, height, movement, goals, age on his side; that rare breed these days, someone that can lead the line on his own.
Click to expand...

I meant at the time. They clearly didn't think he'd make it anytime soon and they were operating in a different market to Everton. Remember he was also being overlooked for Belgium so they weren't alone in having their doubts.
 


You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here