Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Register Log in

[Albion] Denamrk v Maty Ryan







Z

zeemeeuw

Well-known member
Apr 8, 2006
688
Somerset
If that Danish lad deliberately got his hand to that ball in that manner then he is playing in the wrong position because he would be the greatest Goalie ever.
 




Tyrone Biggums

Tyrone Biggums

Well-known member
Jun 25, 2006
13,498
Geelong, Australia
Dislocated shoulder and he stayed on his feet. Take note all you ****ing weak ******** who fake injuries on the ground when nothing happened.
 


Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
61,748
Location Location
Denmark player clearly pulled to the floor inside the box by an Aus player tugging him down by his shirt. No review.

Its a mess.
 




Deadly Danson

Deadly Danson

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2003
3,989
Brighton
And that shirt tug was far more of a penalty. Why was that not referred if you want consistency? The answer really should be neither should have been referred as neither was clear and obvious. Just let the ref get on with it unless it's an absolute clanger.
 




Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
61,748
Location Location
Deadly Danson said:
And that shirt tug was far more of a penalty. Why was that not refered if you want consistency? The answer really should be neither should have been refered as neither was clear and obvious. Just let the ref get on with it unless it's an absolute clanger.
Click to expand...

Exactly. But this was always going to be the problem - one persons "blatant" is another ones "nah".

We've got even more inconsistencies now than before we ever had VAR.
 




Stephen Seagull

Stephen Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2015
452
Barcelona
Easy 10 said:
Exactly. But this was always going to be the problem - one persons "blatant" is another ones "nah".

We've got even more inconsistencies now than before we ever had VAR.
Click to expand...

This was always going to be the issue with video decisions
 


Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
61,748
Location Location
Stephen Seagull said:
This was always going to be the issue with video decisions
Click to expand...

It was indeed.

It'd be interesting to see a montage at the end of the tournament of all the penalty shouts. It'll be fun to go through them and guess or try to remember whether the pens were given or not, to compare them.
 








Kalimantan Gull

Kalimantan Gull

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2003
12,923
Central Borneo / the Lizard
Easy 10 said:
Exactly. But this was always going to be the problem - one persons "blatant" is another ones "nah".

We've got even more inconsistencies now than before we ever had VAR.
Click to expand...

Nothing changes with VAR, it just moves the goalposts. Without VAR the football pundits would be talking long and hard about the Iran goal, how a clear offside was allowed to stand. Instead, with VAR we're talking about slight handballs, whether England should have got a penalty for Kane being wrestled. Without VAR there wouldn't have been more than passing comment about either of these incidents.

The end result though remains the same, discussion on controversial decisions that might have changed the result, together withadded time-wasting, loss of spontaneity about goals, and so on. Its a no from me.
 








drew

drew

Drew
Oct 3, 2006
23,045
Burgess Hill
Kalimantan Gull said:
Nothing changes with VAR, it just moves the goalposts. Without VAR the football pundits would be talking long and hard about the Iran goal, how a clear offside was allowed to stand. Instead, with VAR we're talking about slight handballs, whether England should have got a penalty for Kane being wrestled. Without VAR there wouldn't have been more than passing comment about either of these incidents.

The end result though remains the same, discussion on controversial decisions that might have changed the result, together withadded time-wasting, loss of spontaneity about goals, and so on. Its a no from me.
Click to expand...

Really? You think people would have dismissed the challenges on Kane with VAR? Just like the goal that wasn't for Lampard. That discussion didn't last long.
 


S

SussexSeahawk

New member
Jun 2, 2016
152
Deadly Danson said:
And that shirt tug was far more of a penalty. Why was that not referred if you want consistency? The answer really should be neither should have been referred as neither was clear and obvious. Just let the ref get on with it unless it's an absolute clanger.
Click to expand...

It started outside the box, so VAR can't review it.
 


Easy 10

Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
61,748
Location Location
Kalimantan Gull said:
Nothing changes with VAR, it just moves the goalposts. Without VAR the football pundits would be talking long and hard about the Iran goal, how a clear offside was allowed to stand. Instead, with VAR we're talking about slight handballs, whether England should have got a penalty for Kane being wrestled. Without VAR there wouldn't have been more than passing comment about either of these incidents.

The end result though remains the same, discussion on controversial decisions that might have changed the result, together withadded time-wasting, loss of spontaneity about goals, and so on. Its a no from me.
Click to expand...

I'm with you on that.

BTW, as mentioned earlier, the Iran goal wouldn't have stood anyway. The lino had already clocked the offside and flagged for it.
 








You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here