Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Day for Freedom (live)



BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,013
Jail for breaking reporting restrictions...the information he read out had already been published in full by the local paper, how come the reporters there weren’t sent to jail?

The police had a choice whether or not to prosecute the well known right wing agitator, they chose to do it because they continually harass and persecute him. I’m not a big fan of Robinson but the message this sends out doesn’t inspire me with confidence that unpopular opinions are tolerated in the UK anymore.

A year for this is way OTT considering the pitiful non custodial sentences handed out for actual crimes, theft, assault, you know, crimes.

Does anyone actually know what was said before the youtube video he posted? Didn't the article say that he had been broadcasting for a couple of hours before the arrest. Without an in-depth knowledge of the facebook live broadcast it is hard to say if he was 'inciting' or not. assuming the police and courts have seen the footage they are probably in the best position to judge if he broke the law (again) or not.

It also appears that they chose to prosecute because he has a suspended sentence hanging over him for doing exactly the same thing.
 


carlzeiss

Well-known member
May 19, 2009
5,830
Amazonia
Does anyone actually know what was said before the youtube video he posted? Didn't the article say that he had been broadcasting for a couple of hours before the arrest. Without an in-depth knowledge of the facebook live broadcast it is hard to say if he was 'inciting' or not. assuming the police and courts have seen the footage they are probably in the best position to judge if he broke the law (again) or not.

It also appears that they chose to prosecute because he has a suspended sentence hanging over him for doing exactly the same thing.

The video has been removed from youtube . There are still some videos of protests in London yesterday that we are not permitted to discuss .
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,013
The video has been removed from youtube . There are still some videos of protests in London yesterday that we are not permitted to discuss .

Makes sense I suppose, now that it is evidence.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,264
It also appears that they chose to prosecute because he has a suspended sentence hanging over him for doing exactly the same thing.

so answer to the question "why pick on Nice Mr Robinson", is because he's repeatedly been a naughty boy.
 


binky

Active member
Aug 9, 2005
632
Hove
Does anyone actually know what was said before the youtube video he posted? Didn't the article say that he had been broadcasting for a couple of hours before the arrest. Without an in-depth knowledge of the facebook live broadcast it is hard to say if he was 'inciting' or not. assuming the police and courts have seen the footage they are probably in the best position to judge if he broke the law (again) or not.

It also appears that they chose to prosecute because he has a suspended sentence hanging over him for doing exactly the same thing.

I'm not sure the court would have had time. It only took 26 minutes to wheel him in, decide the evidence, sentence him, and wheel him out again.

It doesn't sound like much deliberation was going on.
 








BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,013
I'm not sure the court would have had time. It only took 26 minutes to wheel him in, decide the evidence, sentence him, and wheel him out again.

It doesn't sound like much deliberation was going on.

Yes that is a bit odd, still i suppose its because of the suspended sentence hanging over him.
 












D

Deleted member 22389

Guest
It's all gone a bit nuts in Downing Street and will be even more nuts today.

https://youtu.be/1q91kzzwdSc

Locking him up will come with a price. They've had to use thousands of police over the last couple of days who should have been working on serious crimes.

This is apparently how you solve problems. If you don't think the same and have a different opinion, unfortunately you will be closed down. Stupid country. People might not support TR, but they are shocked by these actions.
 














knocky1

Well-known member
Jan 20, 2010
12,944
The BBC received a number of complaints regarding the lack of time given to the Telford child abuse trial verdicts .

Their explanation was that due to the Death of Ken Dodd they had limited time available on the Day to report other matters .

If you read the short story the BBC ran on the day in March you will find you are wrong to state 'trial verdicts'. Not that truth matters. You should read ConservativeWoman more carefully before posting.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-43499097
 




BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
17,013
If Tommy Robinson's presence and 'reporting' is going to put the trial in jeopardy because the defence can suggest that the jury have been influenced then surely it is better that he (like other journalists) keep their distance and let the trial run.

It seems to me that some people put the right to free speech (and concocting conspiracy theories) above the rights of victims to get justice.

It is a funny old world.
 


BeHereNow

New member
Mar 2, 2016
1,759
Southwick
some youtuber knowing half a story doesnt understand contempt of court. the police and courts have dealt with someone breaking the law. why question the government? you want the government to make a special exception? change to law so sensitive cases can be reported?

The law? Is that what they're calling it these days?
https://youtu.be/irhQtamQ6Mo
 



Paying the bills

Latest Discussions

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Paying the bills

Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here