Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] VAR does not work for England



GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,716
Gloucester
Do you think maybe, just maybe, our allegiance to England taints the way we see the way VAR is used. There have been many strikers who could have been given fouls called. Referees call a game a certain way and if it doesn't fit the fans allegiance than those fans will scream bloody murder.
No. We will, of course, have been watching more carefully, subjecting decisions to a greater degree of scrutiny, but that's different from seeing it through England tinted spectacles.

Maybe, and fans of other countries probably have been doing the same. We just haven't heard about it. Brazil have just asked FIFA for an explanation into why VAR wasn't used on two incidents in their game with Switzerland.
Good for them - I don't know what the incidents being queried are, but I'd certainly be interested to know, and what the response is. Presumably, as the evidence is officially recorded, appeals can be made at any time - but what sanctions can be applied? Maybe one more thing about VAR that hasn't been thought through yet.
 




The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
Good for them - I don't know what the incidents being queried are, but I'd certainly be interested to know, and what the response is. Presumably, as the evidence is officially recorded, appeals can be made at any time - but what sanctions can be applied? Maybe one more thing about VAR that hasn't been thought through yet.

You can't chalk off a goal two days later because of (in this instance) a push.

Retrospective red cards - and therefore bans - I'd welcome, but that doesn't come under 'VAR', just 'video evidence'. Not that anything springs to mind in the tournament so far that would justify that.
 


Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,287
They were funny, don’t be embarrassed. It was a great evening to be a drunk English fan,

No, no. Well played sir, it made a good night last a bit longer. Wish we had a bit more passion for our country rather than all those who mock those of us who watch all the friendlies and qualifiers and then jump on the band wagon about now, who then think they have the right to an opinion!
Start on the java on Saturday night and carry on Sunday morning...... then start posting on here please

TBF bringing the death of Jihadi John into a thread about VAR is one of my NSC all time achievements!

Ps this is my chest F4127DB8-8938-42C8-A166-388561A5AB0C.jpeg
 




GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,716
Gloucester
You can't chalk off a goal two days later because of (in this instance) a push.
Of course not - neither can you change the result of a game - I realise that, hence my question about what sanctions could be applied.

Retrospective red cards - and therefore bans - I'd welcome, but that doesn't come under 'VAR', just 'video evidence'. Not that anything springs to mind in the tournament so far that would justify that.
Retrospective yellows too - they would probably be 'easier' to give.
 




GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,716
Gloucester
You can't chalk off a goal two days later because of (in this instance) a push.
Of course not - neither can you change the result of a game - I realise that, hence my question about what sanctions could be applied.

Retrospective red cards - and therefore bans - I'd welcome, but that doesn't come under 'VAR', just 'video evidence'. Not that anything springs to mind in the tournament so far that would justify that.
Retrospective yellows too - they would probably be 'easier' to give.
 




Sheebo

Well-known member
Jul 13, 2003
29,287




brakespear

Doctor Worm
Feb 24, 2009
12,326
Sleeping on the roof
I think the Tunisian penalty was a penalty, albeit soft. I think the first rugby tackle on Kane should have been a penalty, not sure on the second as haven't seen it more than once (the video on the thread has been deleted). I think the biggest impediment to England's progress throughout the match though was neither VAR or the ref but our own players wasting so many chances so maybe people do need to look elsewhere for something to blame :)
 




Kinky Gerbil

Im The Scatman
NSC Patron
Jul 16, 2003
57,886
hassocks
I’m hoping this could work in our favour.

Refs won’t want to make the same mistakes on Kane so will be watching him.

The ref was rubbish, he has history of being shite with Var.
 




Easy 10

Brain dead MUG SHEEP
Jul 5, 2003
61,750
Location Location
I think the Tunisian penalty was a penalty, albeit soft. I think the first rugby tackle on Kane should have been a penalty, not sure on the second as haven't seen it more than once (the video on the thread has been deleted). I think the biggest impediment to England's progress throughout the match though was neither VAR or the ref but our own players wasting so many chances so maybe people do need to look elsewhere for something to blame :)

Nobody is saying England weren't profligate, they clearly were. But it doesn't mean there weren't other factors at play that made the result that much more difficult - primarily the fact that Tunisia were awarded the softest of pens when that little weasel Youssef went down clutching his face in fake agony, whilst England were denied two big penalty shouts that the officials weren't even interested in looking at.

Its true that none of that would've mattered so much had we stuck away those numerous chances, but Tunisia were very nearly assisted by the officials to a totally undeserved point.
 


Biscuit

Native Creative
Jul 8, 2003
22,218
Brighton
It's a World Cup being hosted by Russia. I'm not at all surprised that Tunisia were awarded a soft penalty the only time they ventured into our box. VAR provides the Russian state with a really, really easy way to stack the cards against us. Do you honestly think Russia would allow England to win a World Cup on their turf?
 


Munkfish

Well-known member
May 1, 2006
11,871
I’m hoping this could work in our favour.

Refs won’t want to make the same mistakes on Kane so will be watching him.

The ref was rubbish, he has history of being shite with Var.

I am hoping for the same, normally these decsions go against us and wego out, luckily this time around we didnt get the decsions in our favour but it didnt cost us.

All Refs going forward will surely be more inclined to keep an eye on Harry in the box.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 25, 2011
63,909
Withdean area
Nobody is saying England weren't profligate, they clearly were. But it doesn't mean there weren't other factors at play that made the result that much more difficult - primarily the fact that Tunisia were awarded the softest of pens when that little weasel Youssef went down clutching his face in fake agony, whilst England were denied two big penalty shouts that the officials weren't even interested in looking at.

Its true that none of that would've mattered so much had we stuck away those numerous chances, but Tunisia were very nearly assisted by the officials to a totally undeserved point.

Summed up perfectly.
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,336
Uffern
No. We will, of course, have been watching more carefully, subjecting decisions to a greater degree of scrutiny, but that's different from seeing it through England tinted spectacles.

Hmmm ...


VAR provides the Russian state with a really, really easy way to stack the cards against us. Do you honestly think Russia would allow England to win a World Cup on their turf?

Oh dear
 




Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,336
Uffern
They rig elections without batting an eyelid. If you think for one moment they couldn't or wouldn't influence the outcome of the WC you're gravely naive.

Where have I suggested otherwise?

I was pointing out that your assertion is a direct contradiction of GT49er's suggestion that we're debating this because we have a keen interest in England rather than thinking England are being singled out for special treatment.
 




Albion my Albion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 6, 2016
17,834
Indiana, USA
It's a World Cup being hosted by Russia. I'm not at all surprised that Tunisia were awarded a soft penalty the only time they ventured into our box. VAR provides the Russian state with a really, really easy way to stack the cards against us. Do you honestly think Russia would allow England to win a World Cup on their turf?

This is a innocent question without a presumed answer. What exactly does anybody who is Russian have to do with the VAR process?
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here