Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
No guilty Tories, not even any not guilty Tories, just a very real absence of there even being any charges. What will Enrest think?
I think you missed the £70k the Tories were fined then
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Another Labour election goose shot stone dead...
- Thread starter Titanic
- Start date
I think you missed the £70k the Tories were fined then
I think you missed the £70k the Tories were fined then
Who was charged?
No news on Simon Day, the Conservative Party treasurer yet, who was reported to the CPS.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,300
that tweet content sums it up, alot of wishful thinking that there was something here. amusing responses in the CPS twitter, how democracy has come to an end, judiciary are corrupt etc, without apparently understanding the law or reading past the headline.
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
It's a shame being STUPID isn't a CRIME or you would be
As always, cannot provide an answer relevant to the question.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Funnily enough, when I worked for the CPS, before retirement, Keir Starmer was the DPP and head of it. Nice bloke and easy to talk to.
spring hall convert
Well-known member
Note to self: Must try 'inaccurate but not dishonest' on my next expenses return and see how I get on.
- Thread starter
- #29
If you do that deliberately, it will just be dishonest.
spring hall convert
Well-known member
How would they know?
Raleigh Chopper
New member
It's a stich up by the evil Tories.
They are as guilty as a puppy sitting next to a pile of poo.
Is the head of The CPS a mason?
They should have all gone to The Tower until June 9th.
They are as guilty as a puppy sitting next to a pile of poo.
Is the head of The CPS a mason?
They should have all gone to The Tower until June 9th.
- Thread starter
- #32
Read NSC?
CPS dropping a case is pretty common. If they feel there is a chance of not winning. That is quite different as to whether an actual crime has occurred. and evidence gathered. I have sadly experienced seeing the clearly guilty not prosecuted because CPS does not feel the evidence to be bomb proof. That is their job but it can be very frustrating.
spring hall convert
Well-known member
You're no fun.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,300
they'll look at the evidence to see if you are likely to have known it was inaccurate or not. see, your funny note may well be valid if the law and the agency investigating deemed it to be innocent and not worth following up.
Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
The head of the CPS is a woman, so not a mason.
Raleigh Chopper
New member
nickbrighton
Well-known member
- Feb 19, 2016
- 1,918
This was always going nowhere, reported constantly as Electoral Fraud- deliberately to make it sound like vote rigging, which I am pretty sure most people would say if you asked them what Electoral Fraud was, when in fact it was whether or not the cost of a visit by a coach with a nice (or nasty) slogan on the side should be nationally or local accounted for. As I understand it, they aren't even saying they didn't account for the expense, just put it on the wrong line of an accounts sheet. What a waste of police time and money. Should have let the electoral commission deal with it and fine them accordingly. (which they did to the tune of £70k I believe) Expensive mistake but hardly criminal behaviour and widespread electoral fraud
The Birdman
New member
Does Lucas partner work at a private school.?