Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
General Election 2015
- Thread starter Herr Tubthumper
- Start date
Machiavelli
Well-known member
Isn't it surprising that that one interests you. Does this one?
The Populus figures
CON 33%
GRN 5%
LAB 36%
LD 8%
UKIP 14%
And while we're on Ashcroft, aside from his National polls being well out of line with the other pollsters and showing a consistent Tory lead, would you agree that in his constituency polls, he's been highly selective in not only which polls to study of late (there's an awful lot of Scottish constituency polls that have been released during the six-week election period, for instance), and those constituency polls that he's been releasing over the past month or so.
Last edited:
Bold Seagull
strong and stable with me, or...
Machiavelli
Well-known member
This one I knew would interest you, what about this one also released today?
Populus poll gives Labour 3-pt lead
Populus has released a new poll it has carried out for the FT. Here is the FT write-up (subscription).
Labour is three points ahead of the Conservatives, according to a new poll by Populus which suggests that Tory attacks on Ed Miliband’s party have so far failed to dent his lead ...
But with only 10 days until polling day Labour is still at 36 per cent against the Tories’ 33 per cent, according to the poll by Populus, carried out between April 24 and 26. That is a slightly bigger lead than Labour’s 2 point advantage a week earlier ...
Populus still has Ukip on 14 per cent, far ahead of the Liberal Democrats on 8 per cent and the Green party on 5 per cent.
Ernest
Stupid IDIOT
I love the YouGov one in the Sun that they won't mention as it shows Labour in a lead and has done for several days, perhaps [MENTION=36]Titanic[/MENTION] writes for the Sun ?
Hatterlovesbrighton
something clever
When did i do that?
I was asked for an illustration of what it might cost. Personally, when there are lots of economists (and Ed Balls) saying that it would cost money then using an illustration based on costing what Labour says it would gain is fair. There are lots more spurious stats floating about there at the moment, on all sides!!
Hatterlovesbrighton
something clever
A quick scan of http://lordashcroftpolls.com/ doesn't really bear that out IMO. Looks like quite an even spread.
Seagull on the wing
New member
God forbid ...Labour at the purse strings AGAIN...With Nicola Sturgeon pulling Miliband and Balls one way,Len McClusky wrestling with her for control we will have a weak sop for a government,no wonder large companies are looking to move abroad (HSBC) to escape punitive taxes.
Yes I read it. That QC is a Labour supporter who was advising Labour.
The thought of Nicola pulling balls may get one or two people on here excited.
May have to sell my £4 million house and buy two for £2 million each.
Tough decision!
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,300
the left love it, the right dont.
next.
though seriously with Block F remark reminding me, the main problem is it wont raise what's expected. apparently houses are already being split and the concession for older/low income people deferring payments means large chunks of the intended revenue will have to be borrowed.
But I'm just left of centre, and I don't like it. It's called a mansion tax, but it's really a tax on those that live in London and the South East.
Seagull on the wing
New member
Yes...more likely to pull strings though.....of her puppet Labour lapdogs.
beorhthelm
A. Virgo, Football Genius
- Jul 21, 2003
- 35,300
yep, three bed terraces across London will be in, castles in Scotland out. you can see why the SNP love it.
It obviously doesn't effect me, it doesn't effect anyone I know. But it just doesn't seem right to me. Why should wealthy people in the south have to pay more tax than wealthy people elsewhere? They should pay based on their income, with something novel, like income tax.
Behind Enemy Lines
Well-known member
It seems common sense to me that when times are tough, those who have a lot more should pay more. I am at a loss to think how this could possibly be regarded as controversial but Britain is a strange place in this respect.
But on this, although I am not a Lib Dem, I'm actually with them on its policy of increasing the council tax bands but would charge more than it plans. It would be much more straight forward to implement and some commentators have said it might raise more money..
Here we go.........
Labour is pledging a £1m handout to Scottish foodbanks. Why not English ones?
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffee...t-to-scottish-foodbanks-why-not-english-ones/
Labour is pledging a £1m handout to Scottish foodbanks. Why not English ones?
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffee...t-to-scottish-foodbanks-why-not-english-ones/