He sounds like he's confident of a clear win. Anyway, what I can't work out is what happens if either May or Corbyn fail to obtain a deal that looks good for us. Would either of them seriously say to parliament 'We leave with no deal'? Conversely would either of them be able to sponsor a soft Brexit that either fails to 'control our borders' (yes, I know, we already etc etc) or controls the borders but gives us high trade tarifs and visas to Calais? I suspect Corbyn could sell either more easily than May since he can say 'we didn't trigger this mad referendum'. Could Corbyn, as a majority leader or in coalition with the Jocks and Libs (in answer to your question, @is it potg) go further and say to parliament 'we can't get a deal that is remotely acceptable to the future of the UK, so I will not Brexit'? The latter, of course, would mean 'and so I am calling a 'reverse the Brexit' general election'?
None of this seems remotely ideal, and I am shaking my head sadly. That said, I suspect this is dawning on most of those who voted in or out without very strong conviction (the committed of either persuasion will still be committed), and as a consequence it is more likely they (who are largely floating or 'party-fluid' voters in general) will punish the tories (with whoever is leader) than labour. If I were Corbyn I would be thinking 'do I really want to be PM to lead the UK into a mess, whatever the outcome?'. He differs from me in many, many ways, not least on this issue (he is clearly massively up for it).
So it is probably several elections with hung parliaments, or several back and forth elections with whoever is leader of whichever party making a horrible job of leading the country, to be replaced by the other lot who suffer a similar fate.
Boy do I hate 'Dave', the worst PM of all time, for this
