Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Barber on FFP







KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
19,794
Wolsingham, County Durham
Given the fines will be minimal when compared to the treasure of ending up in the PL maybe the league should give a suspended sentence of minus 15 points to the cheaters and it will be enacted when they next fall into the league ?

Define minimal. I would say that they are quite substantial (if imposed correctly of course). Good idea about the points though, but make it 30.
 


halbpro

Well-known member
Jan 25, 2012
2,862
Brighton
I thought that was very interesting from Barber, very insightful. I do agree about his stance that the clubs have voted for this, so how can they challenge it? They'd look pretty daft if they did.
 


KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
19,794
Wolsingham, County Durham
The FA have to try and make FFP work but have they really thought this charity thing through? Even the clubs adhering to FFP will still be losing money year in year out, and if applied properly the fines will be potentially huge. How can football afford to see this massive outflow of cash from the game?

That's a very good point.
 


pishhead

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
5,246
Everywhere
Expect lots of teams to have dodgy sponsorship deals to cover huge losses. I'm thinking QPR and Forest. Both teams are sponsored by their respective owners.
 






bhanutz

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2005
5,998
Lets guess the 3 clubs that didnt vote for it.......umm I will start with Forest...
 


Goldstone1976

We Got Calde in!!
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Apr 30, 2013
13,782
Herts
Expect lots of teams to have dodgy sponsorship deals to cover huge losses. I'm thinking QPR and Forest. Both teams are sponsored by their respective owners.

It's in this sort of area that I anticipate challenges to fines/transfer embargoes to come. Clubs that are penalised will argue the toss about the precise definitions incorporated into FFP, saying that by their interpretation of the rules what they have done is ok. I doubt that many (any?) of the 21 clubs who voted for it will just come out and argue that FFP is flawed in principle; they'll just disagree about the precise interpretation. The 3 clubs who didn't vote for it will have at least a small moral case to argue that the whole thing is a farce, though presumably by playing in a competition under FL rules they are deemed to have accepted all the rules, including FFP.
 




Westdene Seagull

aka Cap'n Carl Firecrotch
NSC Patron
Oct 27, 2003
20,997
The arse end of Hangleton
Define minimal. I would say that they are quite substantial (if imposed correctly of course). Good idea about the points though, but make it 30.

I can't remember the exact figures but a £30m loss results in something like a £5m fine ? Given the TV money and parachute payments if a team comes straight back down it's hardly a punishment. I plucked 15 points out of the air - maybe a graded point deduction system would be fairer.
 
Last edited:


Mowgli37

Enigmatic Asthmatic
Jan 13, 2013
6,371
Sheffield
Cheers for sharing, interesting video and you also got to read the emails regarding Leo's transfer!
 






Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
30,564
Expect lots of teams to have dodgy sponsorship deals to cover huge losses. I'm thinking QPR and Forest. Both teams are sponsored by their respective owners.

Given the FA are involved, expect a lucrative sponsorship deal between one of the beneficiary charities and one of the miscreant clubs, e.g. "Nottingham Forest sign £5million 'sponsorship' deal with St John's Ambulance"
 


KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
19,794
Wolsingham, County Durham
I can't remember the exact figures but a £30m loss results in something like a £5m fine ? Given the TV money a parachute payments if a team comes straight back down it's hardly a punishment. I plucked 15 points out of the air - maybe a graded point deduction system would be fairer.

A 30m loss will result in a fine of a lot more than that - I did work it out once, something like 18m.

Edit. Just found my spreadsheet! 18.68m based on an allowable loss of 8m.
 


The FA have to try and make FFP work but have they really thought this charity thing through? Even the clubs adhering to FFP will still be losing money year in year out, and if applied properly the fines will be potentially huge. How can football afford to see this massive outflow of cash from the game?

It's not the Football Association who are controlling FFP for the Championship, League 1 and League 2 - it's the Football League.
 






W.C.

New member
Oct 31, 2011
4,927
They were originally. The FL changed the destination 2 or 3 months ago.

Thank you. Missed that.

So, the rules are changing already. Be amazed if this serves as any kind of punishment for profligate clubs, whilst we continue to do the right thing. Ho hum.
 


marshy68

Well-known member
Jul 10, 2011
2,868
Brighton
The FA have to try and make FFP work but have they really thought this charity thing through? Even the clubs adhering to FFP will still be losing money year in year out, and if applied properly the fines will be potentially huge. How can football afford to see this massive outflow of cash from the game?

I don't get it. If you spunked all your money on signing messi and you fail to get promoted how are you going to pay the fine ? If your skint your skint.
 


fosters headband

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2003
5,158
Brighton
A 30m loss will result in a fine of a lot more than that - I did work it out once, something like 18m.

Edit. Just found my spreadsheet! 18.68m based on an allowable loss of 8m.

What happens if the club can't pay, as I presume Palace would not have been able to do in 2010. Would the league then apply for a winding up order along with the HRMC?

Would clubs like Palace be allowed to pay the fines at a penny in the pound?
 
Last edited:




Brovion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,359
The FA have to try and make FFP work but have they really thought this charity thing through? Even the clubs adhering to FFP will still be losing money year in year out, and if applied properly the fines will be potentially huge. How can football afford to see this massive outflow of cash from the game?
Agreed. If the fines are trivial they won't act as a deterrent, and if they're substantial the game can't afford, as you say, to lose the money. If the 'fines being re-distributed' idea was quashed by the Premier League then I too support the "Well ok, we'll dock you fifteen points when you get relegated then" approach. And I'd apply it for as many years as the parachute payments last!

Won't happen of course as it will mean the League having to stand up to its biggest clubs - and it'll all just end up in substantial profits for m'learned friends. Maybe the League could keep the fines to pay the legal fees?
 


Brovion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,359
Thank you. Missed that.

So, the rules are changing already. Be amazed if this serves as any kind of punishment for profligate clubs, whilst we continue to do the right thing. Ho hum.
There is the point though that FFP is actually FFCS - Financial ****ing Common Sense. We still need to reign in our losses regardless, and I never make any friends when I say this but I sincerely hope the profligate clubs go bust, get kicked out of the League, reform and start again at the bottom. If a club like ours (well supported with relatively low wages by Championship standards) makes stonking great losses it shows how screwed professional football is.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here