Well said. Agree 100%. Mary Poppins, anyone?
The sequel with Emily Blunt has to be worth something staying alive for surely ?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Film] Mark Kermode
- Thread starter jcdenton08
- Start date
The sequel with Emily Blunt has to be worth something staying alive for surely ?
I know nothing about it. Am I missing something? For me, the 60s socialist parable is unsurpassable.
Psychobilly freakout
HellBilly
Pevenseagull
Anti-greed coalition
- Jul 20, 2003
- 19,613
Now here's the thing .... He's right.... It's the death of narrative comedy, supplanted with a deluge of fart, tampon and dire willy jokes. Wither ye mis an seine? I was literally banging my head on the vaulted ceiling.
Jim Van Winkle
Well-known member
Always a classic, his review of Danny Dyer’s Pimp. Whenever I hear Danny Dyer’s name I always hear it the way Kermode’s says it in this review.
https://youtu.be/gbiKDfgkyBY
https://youtu.be/gbiKDfgkyBY
Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
Big big fan of Kermode and Mayo, love their podcast, intellectual radio with few pretensions other than an intimate love and knowledge of cinema, dressed up as two old men bickering
Dare I say it, I'm a member of the church
Dare I say it, I'm a member of the church
Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
His review of A Quiet Place would disagree with you. Anyway any film lover should hate what Michael Bay has created
The Large One
Who's Next?
Hungry Joe
SINNEN
And a Comsat Angels fan
Didn't know that but I like him even more now.
Always find him entertaining and informative and generally agree with his reviews. He probably has an inflated ego but I'd rather listen to someone with one of those than any of the stream of tediously mediocre types that clog up the airwaves in general.
theroyal
Well-known member
- May 11, 2014
- 434
It was a joke mate, don't stress. I love Kermode. There's a running joke on his podcast about looking like Gove.
jakarta
Well-known member
He knows whereof he speaks, best Film Hack since Barry Norman (and why not?)
vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 27,892
No worries,I never heard the gag about looking like Gove I must admit, but unlike Gove, Kermode knows his stuff !
vegster
Sanity Clause
- May 5, 2008
- 27,892
I think he goes in to every film with an open mind which is what he should do. If a film is rubbish he will say why it is rubbish but with caveats about what he thinks the film was trying to achieve and why it failed. Even in bad films he will often flag up something that was good and some of the reasons why he thinks the film may have failed for him. However, quite often he will say along the lines of " Go and see it and see what you make of it and I'll be interested to see what others think.
He's not perfect, he's paid to give an opinion but he's pretty fair.
I think he goes in to every film with an open mind which is what he should do. If a film is rubbish he will say why it is rubbish but with caveats about what he thinks the film was trying to achieve and why it failed. Even in bad films he will often flag up something that was good and some of the reasons why he thinks the film may have failed for him. However, quite often he will say along the lines of " Go and see it and see what you make of it and I'll be interested to see what others think.
He's not perfect, he's paid to give an opinion but he's pretty fair.
Great summary.
Some might not like Kermode, but his reviews are always carefully reasoned.
I like him and his show with Simon Mayo.
I don't always agree with him. You can pretty much guarantee he will dislike the gross out comedies or the "high" comedies hollywood seems to specialise in. And he will be more favourable on horrors. But all film critics will have their own biases. As a listener/reader, it's about understanding where these biases are and accounting for them when taking any reviews under consideration. I like his type of reviewer, the learned sort that frame their opinions and reviews in an almost academic knowledge of film history. He doesn't like things just because they're indie, or hate them just because they're hollywood. He's willing to revisit films and change his opinion. He doesn't think him liking a film is the be all and end all of it, he recognises that liking or not of a film is a subjective thing.
Yeah, he probably is a bit arrogant, but no one gets into reviewing, presenting a radio show, going on TV etc, without an ego. People who think they or their opinion are meaningless and no one is interested in them wouldn't bother broadcasting them or presenting them to the world.
I don't always agree with him. You can pretty much guarantee he will dislike the gross out comedies or the "high" comedies hollywood seems to specialise in. And he will be more favourable on horrors. But all film critics will have their own biases. As a listener/reader, it's about understanding where these biases are and accounting for them when taking any reviews under consideration. I like his type of reviewer, the learned sort that frame their opinions and reviews in an almost academic knowledge of film history. He doesn't like things just because they're indie, or hate them just because they're hollywood. He's willing to revisit films and change his opinion. He doesn't think him liking a film is the be all and end all of it, he recognises that liking or not of a film is a subjective thing.
Yeah, he probably is a bit arrogant, but no one gets into reviewing, presenting a radio show, going on TV etc, without an ego. People who think they or their opinion are meaningless and no one is interested in them wouldn't bother broadcasting them or presenting them to the world.
Yup, Gove and Nixon seem to be the popular lookalikes.