The Large One
Who's Next?
Not sure. For a start, away fans won't suddenly sit down.
Just a guess, but I'd suggest it will be more self-policed.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
[Albion] Safe Standing at the AMEX
- Thread starter AWAYDAY
- Start date
Not sure. For a start, away fans won't suddenly sit down.
Just a guess, but I'd suggest it will be more self-policed.
darkwolf666
Well-known member
As far as I am aware none of the clubs that have installed or considered safe standing have done so for away fans. As for self-policing, isn’t that the case at the moment and the cause of many arguments.
I am always astounded there are people like sonutterly stupid and uninformed.
Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,444
The drinking argument is nonsense. If alcohol is an issue why is any sold at the ground? Why can I take a hot/very hot coffee in but not a cold alcoholic drink. Mk
studio150
Well-known member
For any safe standing to be brought in, particularly in away sections of grounds there needs to a complete mind change. Currently many fans are put off going to away games because they know that probably someone in the front row will stand, meaning that everyone behind them then has to stand. Those that have difficulty standing for 45 minutes at a time, can't be bothered to go, and they lose out due to the selfish attitude of some.
IF safe standing is brought in, then in away sections it needs to be towards the rear of the section, and anyone not in the safe standing section must sit as they do currently at home games.This way those that currently shun going away will be able to go to away games in the knowledge that they will be able to sit and actually see the match.
For the Amex, I just don't see it happening as I still believe that it is a vocal few that are demanding change, and while others will say they don't object, they then go on to say they wouldn't move to such a section.
As someone else has already said, I rather like my Amex seat, its certainly in a different league to the wooden seat at Turf Moor.
IF safe standing is brought in, then in away sections it needs to be towards the rear of the section, and anyone not in the safe standing section must sit as they do currently at home games.This way those that currently shun going away will be able to go to away games in the knowledge that they will be able to sit and actually see the match.
For the Amex, I just don't see it happening as I still believe that it is a vocal few that are demanding change, and while others will say they don't object, they then go on to say they wouldn't move to such a section.
As someone else has already said, I rather like my Amex seat, its certainly in a different league to the wooden seat at Turf Moor.
Easy 10
Brain dead MUG SHEEP
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...ports-grounds-safety-autority-report-positive
Interesting.
Safe standing across English football has come a step closer after a report found it had “a positive impact on spectator safety”.
The findings, made by the Sports Grounds Safety Authority (SGSA) in an interim report, have been welcomed by government. They could herald the return of standing to the top two divisions in England for the first time since the implementation of the Taylor report, should they be borne out in the final version of the report due this summer.
The SGSA has this season studied behaviour at Celtic Park and Borussia Dortmund’s Westfalenstadion as well as at English clubs Shrewsbury Town, Wycombe Wanderers and Oxford United which are trialling the technology. Their key observation in the interim report is that safe standing “has had a positive impact on spectator safety, particularly in mitigating the risk of crowd collapse.”
The SGSA also observe that safe standing has not caused tension between supporters or between supporters and stewards. “There has been very little conflict as a result of standing,” it said.
While the findings are still provisional, they have met with approval from the government Every political party endorsed the idea of safe standing in their manifestos during last year’s election and the sports minister Nigel Adams reinforced that view in light of the report.
The SGSA’s research will now continue until the end of the season. Should the final report prove positive, it could pave the way to the return of safe standing by the 2021-22 season.
Interesting.
Safe standing across English football has come a step closer after a report found it had “a positive impact on spectator safety”.
The findings, made by the Sports Grounds Safety Authority (SGSA) in an interim report, have been welcomed by government. They could herald the return of standing to the top two divisions in England for the first time since the implementation of the Taylor report, should they be borne out in the final version of the report due this summer.
The SGSA has this season studied behaviour at Celtic Park and Borussia Dortmund’s Westfalenstadion as well as at English clubs Shrewsbury Town, Wycombe Wanderers and Oxford United which are trialling the technology. Their key observation in the interim report is that safe standing “has had a positive impact on spectator safety, particularly in mitigating the risk of crowd collapse.”
The SGSA also observe that safe standing has not caused tension between supporters or between supporters and stewards. “There has been very little conflict as a result of standing,” it said.
While the findings are still provisional, they have met with approval from the government Every political party endorsed the idea of safe standing in their manifestos during last year’s election and the sports minister Nigel Adams reinforced that view in light of the report.
The SGSA’s research will now continue until the end of the season. Should the final report prove positive, it could pave the way to the return of safe standing by the 2021-22 season.
- Nov 11, 2009
- 11,363
Just seen that on the beeb to:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51413557
Im all for it.......... should help to get some extra purchase to luzz your meat pie at Mike Dean
portlock seagull
Why? Why us?
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,081
Or you could have both. Just as was always the case before all seated.
DarrenFreemansPerm
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Another step in the right direction. Personally and probably selfishly I’d be delighted if the North Stand was made all standing, maybe keep a few rows at the front for seating.
I'm all for this. Really should be taken a step further and be the entry requirement into the ground.
The Albion Roar
97.2FM
The bizarre thing is (and perhaps this thread has already covered this), when the club first engaged the fans on this, there was - at best - lukewarm ambivalence. Possibly on the back of the thought that 'well, it will never happen, so what's the point?'.
Given that the discussion has moved on, and some clubs are effectively has constructions within their grounds which would lead to mass law-breaking, maybe the club can ask the fans again. Or the fans approach the club about it.
The return of fans from lockdown would be the ideal time to resurrect the discussion.
Dick Swiveller
Well-known member
- Sep 9, 2011
- 9,159
For an extra £10, you can sing two songs at once up to a maximum of 6 times a year, as long as it is one of your friends and family singing it and they have bought a £25 pass. And are wearing a collared shirt. With no bottle tops.
I remember going to the initial meeting, Q&A session at The Amex, it was advertised on line etc and literally about 25-30 people turned up. Luke warm was an under statement.
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
..and have triple thickness masks
Publius Ovidius
Well-known member
Is that the Man City announcement of railed seats at the very rich Middle Eastern funded stadium?
It would be great to have and a small stand like the North would be prefect for it. The trouble is that some (a majority?) are in the North Stand due to economics or for the view, not to stand and create an atmosphere. Having half and half (top standing /bottom sitting) could work but that would mean moving people around and that also causes problems. This plus the club not being able to make more money from it means that it is never likely to happen.
