I made a claim on pet insurance. My pet hadn't been seen by a vet for a couple of years, so they're trying to get out of the claim saying that the pet should have been seen more often.
My thought is that if they're not going to provide cover, then they should refund the premiums we're paying. Should that be the case?
Thanks
My thought is that if they're not going to provide cover, then they should refund the premiums we're paying. Should that be the case?
Thanks