Tatically Inept !

Lethargic

Well-known member

Oct 11, 2006

3,463

Horsham

• Nov 29, 2014

• #21

bhawoddy said:

No matter what hyypia does he will get slated by most on here.....lose - lose IMO.

Click to expand...

Are you saying that you agree with his tactical decisions today? When I saw the team I was optimistic unfortunately almost every decision after that was flawed. If Solly March cannot play 60 minutes he should not be on the bench ahead of others, simple.
The constant backwards/sideways passing is now painful to watch why can we not pass forward with pace, on the (very) few occasions we did we looked good.

This morning I was very optimistic with my mojo back tonight I am resigned to a relegation battle and poor football, today was the straw that broke the camels back for this generally positive supporter.

 

One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Aug 4, 2006

21,624

Worthing

• Nov 29, 2014

• #22

Commander said:

If you really can't see why Sami did that then there's not much point in trying to talk to you about the game.

Click to expand...

I agree - that was the only thing he did get right tactically. We had just started losing the midfield (as per normal) and Ince made a difference for a bit.

However, unless injured the withdrawal of Elliott was ridiculous, especially given Colunga was out on his feet and JFC was having a mare....

 

B

BensGrandad

New member

Jul 13, 2003

72,015

Haywards Heath

• Nov 29, 2014

• #23

ShanklySeagull said:

This. He switched players and maintained width. It was not a like for like.

Click to expand...

That is the pointu he didnt for most of the time Colunga was on the left and he sent Elliott out there also so the Fulham left back had nobody within 20 yds of him. As no like for like replacement available I would have sent Baldock on to play the channels.

 

ewe2

Well-known member

Mar 14, 2008

2,671

Hailsham area

• Nov 29, 2014

• #24

One Teddy Maybank said:

I agree - that was the only thing he did get right tactically. We had just started losing the midfield (as per normal) and Ince made a difference for a bit.

However, unless injured the withdrawal of Elliott was ridiculous, especially given Colunga was out on his feet and JFC was having a mare....

Click to expand...

....But can Benno last 90,i am not so sure.

 

One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member

NSC Patron

Aug 4, 2006

21,624

Worthing

• Nov 29, 2014

• #25

ewe2 said:

....But can Benno last 90,i am not so sure.

Click to expand...

Perhaps, but we know Colunga can't, and he looked like he was flagging more.......

 

Gordon Bennett

Active member

Sep 7, 2010

384

• Nov 29, 2014

• #26

I assumed that when KLL went off he would bring on March but I think he brought on Ince because he could see that Ruiz was starting to have an impact and find space and that no one was picking him up. Bringing on Ince gave us the extra man in the middle to counter that but with obvious consequences elsewhere!

 

Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy

Jul 5, 2003

71,969

Living In a Box

• Nov 29, 2014

• #27

British Bulldog said:

The tactical ineptness for me was not using the third sub to bring on Baldock to play alongside Bent for the last 5 or 10 mins when we were chasing the game.

Click to expand...

I am trying to be positive about Sammy but hat was plain stupid in my view.

 

Gordon the Gopher

Active member

Jul 16, 2003

988

Hove

• Nov 29, 2014

• #28

Putting Bennett over on the left and then having Colunga on the right straight after kaz went off was inept to say the least. They stayed like that for a while!