Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Official 2015/16 Teams That Can't Catch Us/We Can't Catch Thread







SeagullofMalaysia

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2016
1,948
Somewhere in north Malaysia
Consider Ipswich and Brum out if we win on Monday

On a side note, Wolves become the first side to mathematically play Championship footy next season, too far ahead of the relegation scrap but not enough points for them to overcome Massive in 6th place and also a big GD gap between them and Massive
 
Last edited:


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,865
Brighton
Consider Ipswich and Brum out if we win on Monday

On a side note, Wolves become the first side to mathematically play Championship footy next season, too far ahead of the relegation scrap but not enough points for them to overcome Massive in 6th place and also a big GD gap between them and Massive

If we're speaking mathematically, we can't rule out Wolves squeezing in on goal difference. The 23 goals difference will automatically reduce to 13 by virtue of results (wins increase wolves' by at least 1 each of their five games, and losses reduce Wednesday's by at least 1 for every loss). 13 can be reduced further without abnormal results, a a couple of 2-0s, a couple of 3-0s, and Wolves are in.

It is very unlikely, but is still mathematically possible for Wolves to sneak into 6th place.
 


Acker79

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Nov 15, 2008
31,865
Brighton
Top 7, baby! :rave:

Team pts … (Mx Pts)
1 Burnley 80 … ( 95 )
2 Middlesbrough 79 … ( 97 )
----------------------------------------------
3 Brighton 78 … ( 93 )
4 Hull 70 … ( 88 )
5 Derby 70 … ( 85 )
6 Sheff Wed 68 … ( 83 )
----------------------------------------------
7 Cardiff 63 … ( 78 )
8 Ipswich 60 … ( 75 )
9 Birmingham 59 … ( 77 )
10 Preston 56 … ( 71 )
11 QPR 55 … ( 70 )
12 Wolves 53 … ( 68 )
13 Brentford 52 … ( 70 )
14 Reading 51 … ( 69 )
15 Leeds 48 … ( 66 )
16 Blackburn 47 … ( 62 )
17 Fulham 47 … ( 62 )
18 Bristol City 47 … ( 62 )
19 Huddersfield 46 … ( 61 )
20 Nottm Forest 46 … ( 61 )
21 Rotherham 46 … ( 61 )
----------------------------------------------
22 MK Dons 37 … ( 52 )
23 Charlton 36 … ( 51 )
24 Bolton R 26 … ( 41 )
 


GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,746
Gloucester
Top 7, baby! :rave:

Team pts … (Mx Pts)
1 Burnley 80 … ( 95 )
2 Middlesbrough 79 … ( 97 )
----------------------------------------------
3 Brighton 78 … ( 93 )
4 Hull 70 … ( 88 )
5 Derby 70 … ( 85 )
6 Sheff Wed 68 … ( 83 )
----------------------------------------------
7 Cardiff 63 … ( 78 )
8 Ipswich 60 … ( 75 )
9 Birmingham 59 … ( 77 )
10 Preston 56 … ( 71 )
11 QPR 55 … ( 70 )
12 Wolves 53 … ( 68 )
13 Brentford 52 … ( 70 )
14 Reading 51 … ( 69 )
15 Leeds 48 … ( 66 )
16 Blackburn 47 … ( 62 )
17 Fulham 47 … ( 62 )
18 Bristol City 47 … ( 62 )
19 Huddersfield 46 … ( 61 )
20 Nottm Forest 46 … ( 61 )
21 Rotherham 46 … ( 61 )
----------------------------------------------
22 MK Dons 37 … ( 52 )
23 Charlton 36 … ( 51 )
24 Bolton R 26 … ( 41 )
......and bearing in mind the goal difference, it's almost impossible for Cardiff to catch us - so play-offs are virtually guaranteed as a worst case scenario.
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
23,585
I don't believe in the play-off's. The team in third should go up- as it used to be.

Not that I've suddenly changed my mind or anything.
 


8ace

Banned
Jul 21, 2003
23,811
Brighton
Cf8kFsuWIAAtcvE.jpg
 


Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,735
West west west Sussex
So next season Brentford could still be in the championship or playing either Southampton or Northampton.
 




Brovion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,374
I don't believe in the play-off's. The team in third should go up- as it used to be.

Not that I've suddenly changed my mind or anything.
I said in another thread but the era where the third-placed team was automatically promoted was actually quite short, only 13 years (1974 - 87). For about fifty or sixty years prior to 1974 it was only the top two. THAT'S how it used to be and what I grew up with! (And no I don't want to go back!)
 


Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,339
Uffern
I said in another thread but the era where the third-placed team was automatically promoted was actually quite short, only 13 years (1974 - 87). For about fifty or sixty years prior to 1974 it was only the top two. THAT'S how it used to be and what I grew up with! (And no I don't want to go back!)

That's not right either, it used to be just one team from each division who got promoted -one from Div 3 South, one from Div 3 North) It only became two in 1958/59. So it was only for about 15 years that the top two went up
 


severnside gull

Well-known member
May 16, 2007
24,540
By the seaside in West Somerset
That's not right either, it used to be just one team from each division who got promoted -one from Div 3 South, one from Div 3 North) It only became two in 1958/59. So it was only for about 15 years that the top two went up

.......but two went up from this division

Although admittedly we spent more time in 3(south) and latterly 4 than we ever did in Division 2
 




Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,339
Uffern
.......but two went up from this division

Although admittedly we spent more time in 3(south) and latterly 4 than we ever did in Division 2

Yes, that's true. I was thinking about Brighton's experiences but you're quite right: top 2 in Div 2, top 1 in the other divisions.

It's before my time but what happened if two northern teams went down? Would one go in Div 3 South or would both go in Div 3 North and one of the more midland North teams go into South?
 


severnside gull

Well-known member
May 16, 2007
24,540
By the seaside in West Somerset
Yes, that's true. I was thinking about Brighton's experiences but you're quite right: top 2 in Div 2, top 1 in the other divisions.

It's before my time but what happened if two northern teams went down? Would one go in Div 3 South or would both go in Div 3 North and one of the more midland North teams go into South?

Sadly not before my time :(

The lowest teams regionally were relegated rather than 'the bottom two'
I'm sure people with better memories (it is an age thing) can provide examples :lolol: :lolol:
 






GT49er

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2009
46,746
Gloucester
Sadly not before my time :(

The lowest teams regionally were relegated rather than 'the bottom two'
I'm sure people with better memories (it is an age thing) can provide examples :lolol: :lolol:

No they weren't. The bottom two in division two were always relegated. Teams in the middle, geographically, would get moved between division 3(S) and division 3(N) to keep the numbers even. Coventry City, for example, played in both divisions at various times, as did Mansfield and Port Vale (and probably others).
 


Brovion

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,374
Yes, that's true. I was thinking about Brighton's experiences but you're quite right: top 2 in Div 2, top 1 in the other divisions.

It's before my time but what happened if two northern teams went down? Would one go in Div 3 South or would both go in Div 3 North and one of the more midland North teams go into South?
We're talking about promotion between the top two divisions. Third North and Third South did indeed only have one-up-one-down (which changed to three with divisions three and four) but the First and Second had two-up-two-down.

And if two northern teams went down from division two they'd re-jig the divisional members, so a Midlands club could find themselves in 3N one year and 3S the next . Indeed there used to be a quiz question: what team has played in all six divisions of the football league? (1, 2, 3 and 4, plus 3N and 3S). The answer is Coventry City.
 


worthingseagull123

Well-known member
May 5, 2012
2,579
We're talking about promotion between the top two divisions. Third North and Third South did indeed only have one-up-one-down (which changed to three with divisions three and four) but the First and Second had two-up-two-down.

And if two northern teams went down from division two they'd re-jig the divisional members, so a Midlands club could find themselves in 3N one year and 3S the next . Indeed there used to be a quiz question: what team has played in all six divisions of the football league? (1, 2, 3 and 4, plus 3N and 3S). The answer is Coventry City.

One up one down would have been so frustrating
 






Gary Leeds

Well-known member
May 5, 2008
1,526
Speaking of 3D South, we did finish bottom of the entire Football League in 47-48 or 48-49. Does BG still has memories of that season?

Would that not have been joint bottom along with the team at the bottom of 3D North? Was our goal average better than theirs saving us from the true last spot?

edit
checking it the Northern team that finished bottom were New Brighton with 9 points less than us
 


SeagullofMalaysia

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2016
1,948
Somewhere in north Malaysia
WE'RE GUARANTEED TO BE IN THE PLAYOFFS AT WORST!! :rave:

Now time to wait for [MENTION=12595]Acker79[/MENTION] to spray the red ink over Cardiff... and Wolves will play Championship footy next season, no matter what!
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here